And you maybe right, but I don't know. There are have been other occasions where I've seen people write negative things about her and it's always rubbed me the wrong way. I'm willing to accept good faith criticisms of her actions like the one I mentioned before, but certain comments in this thread don't sit right with me. Attempts at revisionism perhaps? I don't know.
ok maybe im living up to my username here but to me TC69 is like the Stalin of mods
valid to criticize for stuff like recriminalizing homosexually (or ableism), invalid to criticize bc of red scare shit (or transphobia). they both did a lot of good overall
TC69's vision for the site was entirely orthogonal to it's original purpose. Better for some people? Absolutely. Other's hated it, because it was taking the sub away from it's /r/cth roots, and so obviously the people that wanted to stay true to that style of posting are going to be bitter about her and her tenure.
deleted by creator
And you maybe right, but I don't know. There are have been other occasions where I've seen people write negative things about her and it's always rubbed me the wrong way. I'm willing to accept good faith criticisms of her actions like the one I mentioned before, but certain comments in this thread don't sit right with me. Attempts at revisionism perhaps? I don't know.
ok maybe im living up to my username here but to me TC69 is like the Stalin of mods
valid to criticize for stuff like recriminalizing homosexually (or ableism), invalid to criticize bc of red scare shit (or transphobia). they both did a lot of good overall
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
TC69's vision for the site was entirely orthogonal to it's original purpose. Better for some people? Absolutely. Other's hated it, because it was taking the sub away from it's /r/cth roots, and so obviously the people that wanted to stay true to that style of posting are going to be bitter about her and her tenure.
deleted by creator
That's exactly why we should stick to exactly that.