It's a race to the bottom with these 'not-trains'.

Seriously, just build trains.

  • Rev [none/use name]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Well maglev is better than conventional high speed rail in every aspect, so in principle it should be welcomed. This weird truncated thing is certainly not the way to do it though.

    • GothWhitlam [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      Vacuum tubes are inherently costly and dangerous though. They've been a solution looking for a problem since the late 1800s.

      • Rev [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Depending on how you do it and what terrain we're talking about it could be a safer and certainly much more environmentally friendly solution to air travel. But inherently maglev doesn't require vacuum tunnels (or any tunnels - it has a steeper rate of climbing than conventional rail and is an inherently all weather mode of transportation) to work, in fact all previous and current maglev implementations don't use tunnels and look indistinguishable from classic rail to an outside observer.

        As to the vacuum tunnel tech - we will need it eventually, and better sooner than later, for phasing out dirty and wasteful rocket launches and substituting them with mass drivers. So international efforts at both maglev and mass driver R&D should cross-pollinate each other.