Collummcjingleballs [none/use name] to games • edit-24 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square46 fedilinkarrow-up184file-textcross-posted to: chat
arrow-up183external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashCollummcjingleballs [none/use name] to games • edit-24 years agomessage-square46 Commentsfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: chat
minus-squarehauntingspectre [he/him]hexbear4·4 years agoYes, this is exactly why I'll wait for at least one iteration of the hardware before I buy. link
minus-squareMarxistHedonism [she/her]hexbear6·4 years agoI’m the same way. We expect software to have day 1 patches but we’re supposed to be capable of making perfect hardware at launch? I’m sure the hardware has more rigorous QA because you can’t just patch it, but I still think it’s crazy to expect no issues on a first run. link
minus-squarehauntingspectre [he/him]hexbear1·4 years agoExactly. Even a look at every modern console release should show people why not to buy the launch model. Especially since there's no killer next gen games yet, and probably won't be for a year. link
Yes, this is exactly why I'll wait for at least one iteration of the hardware before I buy.
I’m the same way.
We expect software to have day 1 patches but we’re supposed to be capable of making perfect hardware at launch?
I’m sure the hardware has more rigorous QA because you can’t just patch it, but I still think it’s crazy to expect no issues on a first run.
Exactly. Even a look at every modern console release should show people why not to buy the launch model. Especially since there's no killer next gen games yet, and probably won't be for a year.