The mods have shown how they do not care about the posters opinions they just ban people whenever they fgeel like it. Take a look at the mod logs if you care youll see these weird ban reasons like "wrecking" and "sectarianism". The reason why these terms exist is to attack the people with different opinions and the way they get silenced is by the power the mods and admins use. Ive asked so many times for democratic moderation why is it that we cant have it? If the mods gave a shit about their "socialism" as much as their "democratic control over the means of production" wouldnt they give the posters even have the power to influence bans?

  • socialist [she/her]
    hexagon
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 years ago

    Im not mad at people because of they arent "enlightened" like me ive only attacked people when they post stupid shit and its all in the modlogs

    • QuillQuote [they/them]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Oh well good, that's totally fine then, as long as what they said was stupid I guess it's fine to tell them to kill themselves?

      It's fine to be mad that someone has fallen for something you know to be bullshit, but wow you have fucking got to stop taking it out on people for being wrong. You should be mad they were tricked, not that they fell for it. It only hurts others, locks them further into their views, and limits your own ability to grow. I bet you turn that same hatred to people who fall for bullshit on yourself, which means if it ever turned out you fell for some bullshit somewhere you might double down to avoid that pain you've set yourself up for

      idk, but take a look at what you're saying and doing, is this what you believe in? I hope not

      • socialist [she/her]
        hexagon
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 years ago

        ive never said anything wrong and al my posting is still against tankies and the creeps that think its okay to have indoor cats