I feel like I understand communist theory pretty well at a basic level, and I believe in it, but I just don't see what part of it requires belief in an objective world of matter. I don't believe in matter and I'm still a communist. And it seems that in the 21st century most people believe in materialism but not communism. What part of "people should have access to the stuff they need to live" requires believing that such stuff is real? After all, there are nonmaterial industries and they still need communism. Workers in the music industry are producing something that nearly everyone can agree only exists in our heads. And they're still exploited by capital, despite musical instruments being relatively cheap these days, because capital owns the system of distribution networks and access to consumers that is the means of profitability for music. Spotify isn't material, it's a computer program. It's information. It's a thoughtform. Yet it's still a means of production that ought to be seized for the liberation of the musician worker. What does materialism have to do with any of this?

  • DroneRights [it/its]
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems that the main problem with your arguments is that you assume the mind is it's own entity, without a beginning and without any relation to the material world, when, in fact, the mind is a product of the material world.

    Not quite. My problem with your ideas is that I think the material world is a product of the mind. I used to think it was the other way around, like you, but I got radicalised by intersectional feminism.

    Are you arguing real life or a world that you thought up just now? Surely you can exemplify your point with real life, if you think it's correct?

    I was exemplifying my point about real life by imagining a situation in which I didn't value things for pleasure. I'll exemplify my point about a fictional world by referring you back to the point I was making about real life.

      • DroneRights [it/its]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually, it's realism and materialism that are exclusionary to neurodivergent people. Because society always assumes that objective reality aligns with neurotypical perception, and that neurodivergent perceptions are wrong simply for being different. It's intersectional feminism that argues much of the world we live in, if not all of it, is made of social constructs.

    • IceWallowCum [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not quite. My problem with your ideas is that I think the material world is a product of the mind

      Yes, the same thing I criticised - the mind preceding material reality, preceded by nothing. Needs springing into existence by themselves and emerging before the material.

      Btw, how does the "the mind creates the material world" point of view analyses, let's say, groups of native amazonian tribes mostly not wearing any sorts of clothes before first interacting with europeans, or even today? Or the poverty of Haiti, for example?

      Anyway, if you're really interest in finding arguments and not just adopting a point of view and ending thought right there, this question is maybe the most basic of Marxist-Leninist philosophy. That Vietnam book Luna Oi translated lays it out in very simple language while providing a lot of further sources, so it's a good place to start, and Bukharin wrote a book that goes a little bit deeper.