Permanently Deleted

  • DiscoPosting [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    de-conceptualization — It's called "The Secret". The basic idea is that there's a latent psychic energy that all humans tap in to in order to manifest reality. Most of this is done subconsciously, but a select few who truly believe in this supersensual spirit field can use its power to re-shape the world around them. It's as powerful as it is dangerous.

    dubois-depressed — Can I build communism with this "The Secret"?

    de-conceptualization — No. People only use it for small things, like hitting two fewer red lights on the commute home from work, or finding five reál in an old coat pocket.

    de-electrochemistry [Medium: Success] — Aaaugh, this is pointless! Nobody's ever snorted an idea, or shot up positive thinking! Your interests are a lot more material than that, baby. The Frittte liquor shelf is just around the corner.

  • Owl [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your internal thoughts don't affect the outside world. Psychic powers aren't real.

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Assume the worst. If you're right you'll have tourniquettes, menstrual pads, extra water, emergency food, and anti tank weapons ready to go. If you're wrong you'll be pleasantly surprised.

  • Wheaties [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Assume The Worst

    • you're wrong --> pleasant surprise

    • you're right --> :smuglord:

    By assuming the worst, you begin to prepare for it. Being prepared generally makes any situation better.

  • duderium [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will.” — Gramsci

  • Fibby@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    So if anything us Communists should be MORE Doomer

    Unironically, sort of my beliefs. I'm basically a DemSoc who has little faith that reform will work. As Capitalism continues and inequality grows while the planet burns, a more drastic change becomes more and more inevitable.

    I'm already Doomer on the reform - time to preemptively become Doomer on the revolution!

    Btw congrats on the job!

    • ReadFanon [any, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I'd venture a guess that 95% of Marxist-Leninists would prefer to be DemSocs if were simply a matter of personal preference but, of course, MLs are blackpilled on reformism.

      I don't think many MLs actually truly want a violent revolution deep down. I think that they see it as the only viable option. When your opt to flip the table, shit gets messy and chaotic and there's no guarantee that your side will prevail.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. I'd prefer that the capitalists just realize they would have more authentic and fulfilling lives as members of communities instead of demigods isolated from humanity and surrounded by sharks, but that's not going to happen so *loads rifle with revolutionary intent*

      • duderium [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        For about a year before the 2020 primary ended, I was an ML who wanted to believe that there was still a possibility for peaceful reform in the USA. So, basically a demsoc in practice. Seeing Democrats steal Bernie’s delegates right in front of my own eyes changed my mind on that matter quickly and permanently.

        • Fibby@lemm.ee
          ·
          1 year ago

          100% Bernie changed my mind. A simple campaign of "Healthcare for All" got me thinking, why don't we already have that? Pushed me way to the left when I did more reading (looking at you, Karl). Then Bernie getting fucked over started my reform doomer arc.

          A push of reform will gain support for the movement. Reform failing encourages support for a revolution. A threat of revolution makes reform actually possible. These ideologies should go hand in hand but holy fuck do these people normally hate each other.

        • ReadFanon [any, any]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I think there's a lot of poetry surrounding the Cuban revolution.

          So, Che was actually in Guatemala during the coup that deposed Arbenz, who was essentially a social democrat who was instituting pretty milquetoast reforms. That didn't stop the strong arm of imperialism from taking Arbenz off the board though. (I'm not going to go into how this ties into early PR and Edward Bernays because I will prattle on too much.)

          This was a radicalising moment for Che.

          He took this lesson from Guatemala and he continued on his ideological development. There's an argument that Guevara pushed Castro to become a Marxist-Leninist but I don't know enough about that to say for certain, although Che was undoubtedly a very influential figure in the Cuban revolution.

          Now, if we skip past the successful Cuban revolution—a Marxist-Leninist armed revolution—to Allende's presidency in Chile, we have Castro meeting with Allende and not only issuing him a stern warning about the necessity for defending the revolution militarily, you have Castro gifting Allende a gold-plated AK-47 which I doubt was anything less than intentionally symbolic.

          Nevertheless, Allende proceeded on his course for a revolutionary reform and despite getting urgent warnings from Cuba and the USSR that General Pinochet was plotting a coup, he ignored the threat.

          Ultimately, Pinochet carried out his coup successfully and upon storming the presidential palace, Allende took that very same AK-47 and turned it on himself when all hope was lost.

          And we see that the Cuban revolution survives to this day and yet Chile was plunged into decades of the blackest reaction, which successfully eliminated an entire generation of Chilean radicals either by driving them out or by exterminating them.

          If Bernie got in and attempted to actually deliver on his promises, the same thing would have happened to him. It would have been the Business Plot 2.0.

          I think it's necessary for all socialists to take the hard-earned lessons from Allende and to avoid letting the next revolutionary moment slip through our fingers. We owe it to his memory.

          Edit: Well, what do you know? The Tricontinental Institute just dropped a dossier on the Chilean coup and its implications.

  • star_wraith [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The podcast If Books Could Kill has an episode devoted to this book, and one of the hosts explicitly says he’d love to see Karl Marx’s reaction to the book.

    • buckykat [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the Amerikkkan spiritual new age shit is just protestantism with the serial numbers filed off

  • EpicKebabEater [he/him, it/its]
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my experience it's simply your perception of things that change. An unexpected failure is worse than a failure you prepared for. An unexpected win feels better than a guaranteed one. If you don't get your hopes up, you react to both successes and failures better.

  • Des [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    you have to doubly trick the universe. outwardly pessimistic, secretly optimistic, and also prepare for the worst case scenario.

  • muddi [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thesis: thinking hard about ideas will change the material world

    Antithesis: not thinking hard about ideas also changes the material world?

    Synthesis: maybe like, if I stop thinking so hard, I won't be as anxious and screw up things or my retrospective perception of things

    Sorry, no snark intended also I know this isn't a real dialectic lol. I have a similar issue where I overthink and thus ruin things for myself. It took a perspective shift to break out of thinking in terms of luck etc.

  • beef_curds [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if someone is undoing my thoughts with their own thoughts? How do I develop stronger thoughts?

    • FloridaBoi [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Refer to Seinfeld episode called The Betrayal specifically the Kramer plot with FDR

  • MerryChristmas [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The true secret is to gamble a small amount of money against yourself every time you enter a situation.