I mean, if you want to convert normies, Hasan really is the ideal spokesman, he just strikes me as inauthentic at times, but that's probably because his content has some commercial considerations. Just seems like he's got the depth of someone who regurgitates ideas rather than synthesizes his own.
So other than Vaush saying offensive and edgy things, is there really any difference between them?
deleted by creator
The biggest difference is that Hasan cash work as part of a leftward pipeline much more effectively than vaush because he isn't constantly punching left, and doesn't declare himself the be all end all of socialist thought. Vaush has idiotic takes-lots of people do- but he also has the affect of discouraging people from doing their own investigations of socialist theory and ideas.
The difference is that if Hasan deleted tinder, Tacoma would genuinely weep
Hasan says edgy and offensive things. Vaush says incorrect things.
What has Hasan ever said that's edgy and offensive?
Saying the US deserved 9/11, that bit about Dan Crenshaw's eye. Edgy. Offensive. Not wrong though.
So channeling Bill Maher from 20 years ago (who kicked off the air for saying the 9/11 hijackers weren't cowards) and late-night talk show skullfuck humor are considered edgy now?
Well.. yeah.. Nobody said it was super cool or mind blowing. But people lost their goddamn minds. Alex Jones went on a rant about it. It was funny.
If it were anything groundbreaking maybe I'd watch the stream.
Idk who Vaush is
This is my favorite of his videos.
Star Trek here we come!