Obviously doesn’t fly with authorial intent, but it’s a solid revisionist reading.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    This was a really good article. It needs re-writing for lib-appeal though. The concept of this take is good, the execution is one that will make a lib close the window after about 30 seconds of reading.

    Give it a Guardian-reader lib tone and you'd get people sharing it around.

    • KiaKaha [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      I wonder if Current Affairs would take it. They look respectable.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        With the right rewrite I think so. It's not even a huge rewrite, the work is good, it just needs specific leftist phrasing changed to lib-friendly things. There's a bit too many "workers" in there and you can't use proletariat or bourgeoisie in lib-friendly works. Instant brain shutdown.

        If you did a rewrite with a particularly good snooty pseudo-intellectual tone you could really get the libs that like to sound as clever as possible going with it. You could easily give it an "I'm incredibly clever" edge.

  • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    The "Winston is a horribly unreliable narrator who hates poor people and women" part is actually super convincing.

  • Ectrayn [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Ohhh nice find, it was interesting thanks! Also, the comments are depressing.