• DasKarlBarx [he/him,comrade/them]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    I haven't checked this specific article but most of the time these things are adjusted to be 1usd/day adjusted for ppp, it's incredibly standard for poverty alleviation so it would be weird if this article didn't do that.

    • My_Army [any]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • DasKarlBarx [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah but this an in international standard that even China follows in order to submit reports to the UN.

        If you read in the article it's actually $2.30/day adjusted for ppp. Plus as another commenter said looks to secure food and clothing on top of that.

        • The_word_of_dog [he/him]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          I'll take an extra 60 bucks a month at this point please.

          Basically ends up being a free month of rent a year. God that'd rule

          • DasKarlBarx [he/him,comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            Yeah it's a spectacular achievement. In 2011 (the last time research was done on it) there was still a good deal of people living on under $2/day (including food and housing subsidies into that calculation) and I'm sure it's only gone up since then.