I think its because the film does ultimately frame Foster as a tragic figure, especially in the end. His actions and choices in the film are reprehensible but they come from an understandable anxiety that he has no path forward that resembles a life of dignity or stability. He's not unlike Joker's Arthur Fleck in that way.
I think its because the film does ultimately frame Foster as a tragic figure, especially in the end. His actions and choices in the film are reprehensible but they come from an understandable anxiety that he has no path forward that resembles a life of dignity or stability. He's not unlike Joker's Arthur Fleck in that way.