Let's be honest, the majority here probably has a github account. Some of us are happy as a clam and wouldn't switch no matter what happened, but there are some who would and haven't yet. Why?

  • xchino@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty much any deterioration of service would do it, I'm not tied to github at all, it works but so does gitlab and self hosted solutions.

  • notTheCat@lemmy.fmhy.net
    ·
    1 year ago

    Other hosters gaining more popularity, among other reasons, GitHub is owned by one of the worst companies around, I found Codeberg and switched there, now almost all of my projects live on Codeberg, mirrored to GitHub cause I don't expect an employer would follow a link to Codeberg if I solely include it on my CV

  • moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Once federation gets added to one of the FOSS, self hosted alternatives, I'll probably switch. I'll mirror stuff to github probably, for resume/recruiter purposes, but the CI/CD, website deployment, and main development will happen on whatever alternative I chose.

  • lysdexic@programming.dev
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If GitHub changes terms of use to pay for basic stuff, or starts breaking compatibility or adding egregious bugs, I would start looking for alternatives.

    A while ago I had all my personal projects on GitLab. I was a GitLab fanboy and advocated it everywhere to the point I convinced the project manager of a previous job to migrate the team's projects to it and pay for GitLab ultimate. Without going into details, that goodwill ended the moment I stumbled upon a regression introduced by GitLab which affected my personal projects, and their customer support essentially said the issue was won't fix but it was fixed in premium customers. I simply unblocked myself by moving all projects to GitHub, disabled GitLab CICD and shut down my GitLab runners, and onboarded onto a mix of GitHub Actions and CircleCI. I could still stick with GitLab, but why bother?

    I would do the same to GitHub if I experienced anything remotely similar.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I don't know what Gitlab is doing. They burned so much goodwill with their recent pro-business and fuck opensource dev attitude, that I consider them dead in the water. It's a real pity because I consider their offering to be way ahead of github (project management, issue management, CICD, devops experience, etc.), but they hide it all behind Premium even on self-installs. I really want to use them because they're better and opensource, but their pricing is beyond fucked IMO.

      If Codeberg were Gitlab lite and working towards implementing gitlab features, I'd use them, but they're just github lite and github is shite, IMO

    • Nate@programming.dev
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope that charging for basic stuff never comes. I doubt it since like the first thing MSFT did after buying it was to make some pro stuff free (like private repos)

  • Tobias Hunger@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is that you lose out on dev attention when moving away from github.

    I moved my projects into github when placeholder projects literally containing a README with a link to the real repo only got way more interaction on github than in the real repository: More stars, more views, more issue reports and even more PRs (where the devs have obviously Cloned the repo from the actual repository but could not be arsed to push there as well).

    If you want your project to be visible, it needs to be on github at this point in time:-(

  • Ethan@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using GitLab for years. I have a GitHub account but at this point I only use it to contribute to other projects.

  • CarbonScored [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I've never really heard of alternatives, to be honest. If others are equally easy to use and work with Git, I'd do it. Taking suggestions for alternatives?

    • Ethan@programming.dev
      ·
      1 year ago

      GitLab. You can use their SaaS offering (gitlab.com) or run the open source version on your own server(s).

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was self hosting GitLab for a while. The docker container was quick and easy to set up, simply worked out of the box.

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never had much use for an account on a public repo and started disliking GitHub once it got bought, so I'm in the third category: never had any repo on GitHub, anything marginally significant that I have (i.e. only one private repo atm) I host in Codeberg. You can follow them on the fediverse @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de

  • zygo_histo_morpheus@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    I'm not in charge of many open source projects but the last one I actually put up on gitlab instead. We use gitlab at internally at work and it's completely fine. I mostly use my github account to interact with repos that other people host on github.

  • UlrikHD@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    All it took for me to switch to GitLab was a larger free lfs quota which I wanted for a project. The superior webpage UI made me migrate every old project to it too.

  • Daeraxa@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    I made a similar post a while ago if you want to see some more answers - https://lemmy.ml/post/1990593

  • dbilitated@aussie.zone
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it's free and convenient? if there was another reliable, free git host with a polished web interface and decent cli for features like issues, sure, I'd consider moving to it. I'm not in the market though, I have other work to do

    also the github actions workflows are brilliant.