• Phenyq@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually, Lavrov did not said that sanctions will be lifted, he said that there will no be new sanctions

    Here's the video: https://t.me/zarubinreporter/1302

    He's saying here as an answer to "Why Russia is sanctioning DPRK?" basically this: "Russia wasn't sanctioning DPRK, Security Council was. Sanctions were implemented in completely different enviroment, and, as always, the West did not do anything on their part what we were agreing on. Russia and China were lied to, and the West is suppling weapons to South Korea, SEVERAL YEARS AGO WE AGREED WITH CHINA THAT THERE WILL NO BE NEW SANCTIONS ON DPRK"

    By the way, I have limited knowledge of English, and also were writing basic meaning of his words, not literal translation

    • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you, I thought this was unfortunately unrealistic and I was right to hold my hype back. Sad but at least they won't add more sanctions.

      • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's actually more than that, it means that they plan on increasing bilateral trade and economic ties in a massive way such that the old sanctions will become increasingly obsolete as they will simply develop more and more ways of circumventing them.

        In effect the sanctions will still be there (because it's virtually impossible to lift Security Council sanctions ever as the West has veto power) but they will be an empty formality. Make no mistake, these developments that we're seeing are HUGE.

      • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Announcing this now though, is an indication of intentions. And the intentions are probably to raise trade with DPRK as a first stage. There's also a possibility that DPRK might attempt to join BRICS for trading.

  • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why exactly was China sanctioning the DPRK?

    Also, good for them. The DPRK is a country of enormous potential ideology wise, people wise and resources wise.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is worth noting that even as China went along with sanctions, they were arguing for a gentler approach and I think successfully derailed a couple of escalation attempts by the US. They were probably scared of being pushed away from western Bloc countries if they sided too hard with the DPRK, however unjust that treatment of True Korea is.

      • ButtigiegMineralMap@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even still, kinda odd that China would follow the sanctions on a neighboring country that is friendly to them. Glad to hear that things are changing

        • Buchenstr@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          China has done some shady things when it comes to foreign policy. It's actually one of the main critiques I have of china, and while the foreign policy they conduct is far better than pre-Xi, is still far too conformist and 'pragmatic' for my liking, especially considering it'll benefit more nation's if china becomes more assertive.

          From giving weapons to the Philippines government to fight Filipino revolutionaries, to its participation in the Nepalese civil war in the favour of the government, instead of the communists. Still I'm hopeful china will correct this mistake soon.

      • Life2Space@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I think that China wasn't very pleased with the DPRK conducting nuclear tests and potentially harming Chinese soil and people. This isn't an issue anymore, though.

      • Teapot [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        China and Russia are on the security council, and could have vetoed them

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      China's stated reason for the sanctions is a policy of a de-nuclearized Korean peninsula. In theory, if the DPRK got nuclear weapons without Chinese opposition, there's nothing China can then say if the ROK pursued nuclear weapons in response.

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    uncritical support for the DPRK in its heroic struggle to liberate occupied Korea from the genocidal American empire

    Death to America kim-salute

  • Bnova [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the US gets to use its nukes then the DPRK gets to use theirs, fair is fair.

    • Darkerseid@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      article here- mind the tone in this one. https://news.liga.net/en/amp/politics/news/lavrov-kontseptsiya-izmenilas-rf-bolshe-ne-podderjivaet-sanktsii-protiv-severnoy-korei

      Here are the list of sanctions against them. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/north-korea-sanctions-un-nuclear-weapons

      here’s what i found so far. no new sanctions against them (russia vetoed last ones as well) and lifting some sanctions they imposed on them from 2006 because of nuclear program

    • Darkerseid@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      article here- mind the tone. https://news.liga.net/en/amp/politics/news/lavrov-kontseptsiya-izmenilas-rf-bolshe-ne-podderjivaet-sanktsii-protiv-severnoy-korei

      Here are the list of sanctions against them. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/north-korea-sanctions-un-nuclear-weapons

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interestingly, DPRK uses two types of rail in their grid. One matches Russian width, the other seems to match Chinese one. So it should make the logistics of the project a bit easier, compared to running rail to Europe (which uses a more narrow rail)