People always say NASA is underfunded, and it is, but we could end homelessness in America for the cost of funding NASA for 11 years. We could also pay for it over 10 or 20 years and it'd increase the federal budget by around half a percent or less. And that's at $400,000 per house which is probably a high estimate although there would be some overhead associated with locating housing in the right places and moving people around.
My point is that this is not an ambitious project. But then, who knows what happens if this eviction/foreclosure crisis is allowed to unfold.
deleted by creator
NASA's how we know so much about climate change and how we're ruining our planet. Also there are asteroids out there that could hit earth and destroy like entire countries and statistically it's pretty unlikely to land on Great Britain so it'd be smart to develop a way to deflect them eventually (or aim them at Great Britain).
Yeah having a scientific study program funded by the government is good, making its PR campaigns about stupid shit like space exploration is bad. There’s so much in this planet we have no clue about, more to study and to learn, but exploration of outer space has been promoted as the greatest achievement in humanity. While we destroy this one.
It's important to have both applied science and fundamental research. Fundamental research is how we find new unexpected breakthroughs that don't derive from simple iterative improvements of existing processes. NASA and space exploration in general is essentially engineering-heavy fundamental research.