Found it through this: https://www.dailydot.com/debug/proud-boys-proud-girls-parler/ And this: https://www.reddit.com/r/ParlerWatch/comments/kmgtis/proudboys_not_down_with_proudgirls/
Not sure if directly linking Parler is ok here, so I won't, but you can find the account through the DailyDot article.
Comments there are full of women being like "Yes I agree with you" and saying traditional gender roles are good. Hard to tell whether its legitimate self-hating women or sockpuppets, either is distinctly possible.
Yes but women up until a decade ago weren't going into traditionally male dominated careers. Even now that women are looking at male dominated jobs it is still a very small percentage isn't it? Can you really say it's because of women entering the workforce? Or was it because unions were gutted and manufacturing largely went over seas?
Wages aren't entirely insulated by industry, though. A simple exemplary scenerio: if everyone knew engineers could stop engineering tomorrow and get data entry jobs for 45k/year, engineering firms would pay their engineers more to keep engineering. But if those decent jobs aren't available to them, the firm knows the workers will be much more likely to accept 45k a year to engineer.
Though some industries ("biomedical engineering") are more insulated from wage depression and men-dominated careers do tend to be more insulated than women- dominated or equitable careers.