Why? Lol, literally what do you want changed? Should twitter ban users from discussing racism? Should dunking on blue check accounts be illegal? Maybe cops should do "wellness checks" on people who participate in cancel culture? Why exactly do you want rich pundits doing more "toxic bernie bro" discourse, except targeted at "cancel culture" accounts? "Cancel culture" is literally just posting, and I don't care that someone who went into a PR heavy field and was bad at PR lost a contract.
No, it's not important to me. Which is why I don't think it's interesting to discuss. Especially since I don't see any solution to people dunking on other people which aren't heavy handed and totalitarian. But go ahead, I'll listen to your discussion. How do you solve the perceived problem? What do you do with random individuals that dunked on this guy?
I don't know what you are doing but just stop it. its fucking weird. Now; this is an instance of too much cancel culture so we should discuss it in order to reduce its amount
How do you stop it? Lol. If there's nothing to be done, I don't see why it needs to be discussed. Also, I thought dunking on that weirdo's treatment of his kid was fun, so idk, I don't want anyone stopping that. I don't want to stop dunking on weird dudes just because it triggers some people.
Lol, that's kind of an absurd abstraction. A more charitable reading is that I don't think tackling individual behaviour is something that can be addressed with having a conversation alone. If you want stricter worker protections, fine. But I don't think you're going to stop magically people from posting.
so which one of you complained about the pundit class talking too much about cancel culture
Are you saying they don't talk too much about cancel culture? Lol
I am saying this is an instance of which more talking about cancel culture would've been good
Why? Lol, literally what do you want changed? Should twitter ban users from discussing racism? Should dunking on blue check accounts be illegal? Maybe cops should do "wellness checks" on people who participate in cancel culture? Why exactly do you want rich pundits doing more "toxic bernie bro" discourse, except targeted at "cancel culture" accounts? "Cancel culture" is literally just posting, and I don't care that someone who went into a PR heavy field and was bad at PR lost a contract.
is this important to you or something? The whole thing is mindbogglingly overblown and noone seems to want to discuss it
No, it's not important to me. Which is why I don't think it's interesting to discuss. Especially since I don't see any solution to people dunking on other people which aren't heavy handed and totalitarian. But go ahead, I'll listen to your discussion. How do you solve the perceived problem? What do you do with random individuals that dunked on this guy?
I don't know what you are doing but just stop it. its fucking weird. Now; this is an instance of too much cancel culture so we should discuss it in order to reduce its amount
How do you stop it? Lol. If there's nothing to be done, I don't see why it needs to be discussed. Also, I thought dunking on that weirdo's treatment of his kid was fun, so idk, I don't want anyone stopping that. I don't want to stop dunking on weird dudes just because it triggers some people.
if your axiom is that dialogue is incapable of influencing reality then you couldve said it forehand and not wasted my time
Lol, that's kind of an absurd abstraction. A more charitable reading is that I don't think tackling individual behaviour is something that can be addressed with having a conversation alone. If you want stricter worker protections, fine. But I don't think you're going to stop magically people from posting.