https://twitter.com/micsolana/status/1346142918600437760?s=19
Also checkout this tweet on what they said about coal miners
https://twitter.com/gabrielwinant/status/1346176034429923335?s=19
https://twitter.com/micsolana/status/1346142918600437760?s=19
Also checkout this tweet on what they said about coal miners
https://twitter.com/gabrielwinant/status/1346176034429923335?s=19
I agree. GDP of the US, perfectly divided to every person (including elderly and children,) is around $120,000 a year. Programmer lifestyles (aka, not being constantly worried about bills and being able to afford moderate luxury,) should be the norm. Granted that GDP needs to go down to account for decolonialization and climate change, but most people should have an equivalent lifestyle to $80k a year. Anyone making less is getting robbed by capitalism.
The dirty secret about GDP is money isn't real.
Modernizing the US economy at the pace necessary to avert climate change could be a big boost to GDP. Real quality of life for the bulk of people doesn't need to go down. What would change is the methods that quality is delivered.
The obvious changes would be how we produce energy, how we transit, how we provide health and education, and how we build infrastructure. But there's also a lot of waste we could apply time and energy to address (the sheer volume of packaging going into landfills, the volume of food waste, our loss of biodiversity). Changes to and operation of a new system will take monumental amounts of time, effort, and entrepreneurship. All that makes Big Line Go Up. All of it should entitle participants a place in society that's comfortable.
If anything, median quality of life should continue to improve, even in the seat of empire. There's so much slack that it's still very possible.
deleted by creator
Replacing marketers with journalists would be nice. Less people trying to up your rate of consumption. More people documenting the historical, cultural, and natural.