I mean sure, but what pressure is realistically put on you that you can't just brush off if you're not concerned about "your career in politics" or whatever? I doubt anybody is threatening her family or something to make sure she votes for Pelosi. Somebody truly committed to the working class would value showing how fucked up the entire system is over their own political career.
Anyway, this reminds me of an Obama quote.
I found myself spending time with people of means—law firm partners and investment bankers, hedge fund managers and venture capitalists. As a rule, they were smart, interesting people. But they reflected, almost uniformly, the perspectives of their class: the top 1 percent or so of the income scale that can afford to write a $2,000 check to a political candidate. They believed in the free market and an educational meritocracy; they found it hard to imagine that there might be any social ill that could not be cured with a high SAT score. They had no patience with protectionism, found unions troublesome and were not particularly sympathetic to those whose lives were upended by movements of global capital... I know that as a consequence of my fund-raising I became more like the wealthy donors I met. I spent more and more of my time above the fray, outside the world of immediate hunger, disappointment, fear, irrationality, and frequent hardship of the other 99 percent of the population—that is, the people that I’d entered public life to serve. And in one fashion or another, I suspect this is true for every senator: the longer you are a senator, the narrower the scope of your interactions. You may fight it, with town hall meetings and listening tours and stops by the old neighborhood. But your schedule dictates that you move in a different orbit from most of the people you represent.
And perhaps as the next race approaches, a voice within tells you that you don’t want to have to go through all the misery of raising all that money in small increments all over again. You realize that you no longer have the cachet you did as the upstart, the fresh face; you haven’t changed Washington, and you’ve made a lot of people unhappy with difficult votes. The path of least resistance—of fund-raisers organized by the special interests, the corporate PACs, and the top lobbying shops—starts to look awfully tempting, and if the opinions of these insiders don’t quite jibe with those you once held, you learn to rationalize the changes as a matter of realism, of compromise, or learning ropes. The problems of ordinary people, the voices of the Rust Belt town or the dwindling heartland, become a distant echo rather than a palpable reality, abstractions to be managed rather than battles to be fought.
AOC (and the squad) are useful in the radicalization pipeline, but make no mistake. She's not like you or me, and she doesn't have your best interests at heart. She's already one of them.
I mean sure, but what pressure is realistically put on you that you can’t just brush off if you’re not concerned about “your career in politics” or whatever?
No, nothing would surprise me about vested interests implying or carrying out violence to protect their wealth and power, you're right. I just don't think we're at the point where any of that is happening yet.
I mean sure, but what pressure is realistically put on you that you can't just brush off if you're not concerned about "your career in politics" or whatever? I doubt anybody is threatening her family or something to make sure she votes for Pelosi. Somebody truly committed to the working class would value showing how fucked up the entire system is over their own political career.
Anyway, this reminds me of an Obama quote.
AOC (and the squad) are useful in the radicalization pipeline, but make no mistake. She's not like you or me, and she doesn't have your best interests at heart. She's already one of them.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Damn, and people say Obama didn't have a theory of change
The real Paul Wellstone black box.
I mean probably not but would it surprise you if they did?
No, nothing would surprise me about vested interests implying or carrying out violence to protect their wealth and power, you're right. I just don't think we're at the point where any of that is happening yet.