I aggregate between decent to lib sources (whether it be Current Affairs or Qiao Collective or Al-Jazeera) along with bad to right wing sources (the Economist, WSJ, Business Insider).
Unless highly contentious or developing, the basic contour of brute facts should be somewhat discernible. After that, there's never a set interpretation, even amongst people ostensibly with the same views or tendencies. Don't rely on any specific singular (even leftist) news source to expand a worldview, try to integrate what's being presented with your own theoretical understanding and political curiosity.
I aggregate between decent to lib sources (whether it be Current Affairs or Qiao Collective or Al-Jazeera) along with bad to right wing sources (the Economist, WSJ, Business Insider).
Unless highly contentious or developing, the basic contour of brute facts should be somewhat discernible. After that, there's never a set interpretation, even amongst people ostensibly with the same views or tendencies. Don't rely on any specific singular (even leftist) news source to expand a worldview, try to integrate what's being presented with your own theoretical understanding and political curiosity.