I come from india, and even though i hate how india is treating people nowadays, I just can't help but feel a sense of protectiveness towards it when it comes to border conflicts with china/pakistan. A lot of people here, even those who don't identify strictly with the hindu nationalist movement have a sense of enmity towards china then and now because of how they acted regarding the intial conflict at a Himalayan border.
Maybe this goes beyond the scope of the original question. but do maoists see maoist china as totally perfect, as if they have done/can do no wrong? because whenever i look at events like the border conflict between china and india, and how china acted towards tibet, I can only get the feeling that they've been the initial aggressors.
this is my first post on here, so please be gentle
what's so good about "owning the dalai lama"? isn't it bad that china would try to take control over some religion and their practices?
The fact that the Dalai Lama owned slaves is a big one, as is the fact that communists would have the skin stripped from them and left to die in the elements.
source?
The Myth of Friendly Feudalism