I'm seeing some dumb-ass takes about how "online isn't real" and how it's "a drop in the bucket." But seriously, how did you all become aware of leftist ideas? How does anyone in nations such as the US become politically literate? How many of you were former atheist edgelords or shitposters on reddit?
Seriously, online does matter. It wasn't Fox News that created the alt-right Charlottesville rally. It was the fucking Sargon/skeptic/manosphere pipeline, which was primarily a youtube phenomenon. Or how about the comrades that listened to Chapo, and were inspired to travel to Iowa to help Bernie win the Iowa caucus? For Christ's sake just look at how much of an influence Facebook has had on the CHUDs. To ignore that we live in a neoliberal hellscape where the vast majority of us only find some kind of solace or connection in the online world is to ironically ignore material conditions. Something can be "not real" but still have a HUGE affect on the "real world" (e.g. money, gender). Have the recent voices of trans comrades and POC comrades about their issues here not taught anyone anything? Doesn't take a genius to see this.
For those that scream "rEaD tHeOry" take a step back and think, what the hell were many those "classic Marxist texts?" A lot of them were political pamplets or, as others have pointed out before, literally debate-bro replies to others. How is that any different than online shit now? Honestly, if Marx et. al were alive today, wouldn't they use podcasts, tweets, and youtube vids to spread their messages?
TL;DR: online does matter. Seriously, how did any of you become politically aware, be honest.
Q people getting elected is a result of them going out and doing the work of getting elected. That is doing politics. If you go do the work of convincing a district to elect you, that's wholly different than just being an epic online person. I'm not arguing that getting yourself elected isn't politics.
But ask yourself, how do they accomplish this? I'll tell you: online.
They accomplish this by doing paper work and campaigning. No that's not all online. Using the internet as a media outlet is not the same thing as posters causing political change.
Q-anon is pretty much an online phenomenon. I think that pretty much says it all. I think we're just gonna have to agree to disagree here.
Yes but Q inserting itself in political reality happened offline. You're saying correct things it's just that at some point you make a leap. Q anon is online. There are young online people who show up to protests. You can use the internet to spread ideas and discuss things with people. You can use the internet to advertise your campaign and get people to make phone calls for you.
But a chronically online leftist who is too scared to do stuff outside (ie go talk to people face to face, go door to door, make phone calls, join an org, go to events, etc) or unwilling shouldn't mistake their being online with doing politics. You're not changing anything by going over to cumtown.org and saying they're being racist. You're not doing anything by having an inclusive profile picture. You're not fighting fascism by banning trolls and fascists. And this isn't a means of gatekeeping or judgement. Not everyone has to do stuff. Some people cant' because it's too dangerous or they're disabled. That's fine. It's just a problem when enough chronically online leftists confuse posting with doing politics and they think that's where the movement is. If you think the right has pipelines that change people's minds, then so do we. And it's possible to have a "podcast to shitpost" pipeline. My main pushback on this discussion is not to encourage people who think that posting online is going to cause all the ghouls in government to give us socialism.
If you can cyberbully someone online to the point where it affects their real life, then you can do politics online. Just look at what an online space has done for this comrade: https://hexbear.net/post/70815