3: Kinda agree, but I see a problem, namely that the "50% downvoted" exemption wouldn't work for the first person to downvote it. Maybe it checks retroactively? So a bot would have time to differentiate between someone trolling and someone downvoting a legitimately shit take
4: I am pretty sure we have that already, but it can and should def be expanded if it helps in any way.
5: Agree fully.
6: on one hand, cool idea, on the other hand, could mean even more work for already overworked admins
7: sounds alright to me.
8: I'd leave the decision to the admins as for whether it is permanent, but I agree with the IP part.
9: Kinda agree, kinda don't, because without those posts, chances are that nobody (except the ones affected obv) would have even noticed the rise of Transphobia on the site.
10: If it's possible without having to do too much tech work, sure, sounds good.
deleted by creator
Here are my views and suggestions on these:
1: Support it fully.
2: Agree, no criticisms there.
3: Kinda agree, but I see a problem, namely that the "50% downvoted" exemption wouldn't work for the first person to downvote it. Maybe it checks retroactively? So a bot would have time to differentiate between someone trolling and someone downvoting a legitimately shit take
4: I am pretty sure we have that already, but it can and should def be expanded if it helps in any way.
5: Agree fully.
6: on one hand, cool idea, on the other hand, could mean even more work for already overworked admins
7: sounds alright to me.
8: I'd leave the decision to the admins as for whether it is permanent, but I agree with the IP part.
9: Kinda agree, kinda don't, because without those posts, chances are that nobody (except the ones affected obv) would have even noticed the rise of Transphobia on the site.
10: If it's possible without having to do too much tech work, sure, sounds good.