Thumbnail is clickbait in the sense that the video does not address specific instances by specific creators, but is more of a call on everyone to reflect on certain behaviors we might/might not engage with. Just watch the first two minutes if that's all the time you have right now, but do that much at least.
Edit: Some people are taking quotes that the AI has written in a comment and acting as if that’s what’s actually in the video. It’s not. I thought it should be obvious that if you want to critique the video, you have to watch it rather than depend on an AI to to provide a a summary.
Don't post shit like this here again. And if anyone sees this again let me know and I'll lightning remove it.
Also if you want to participate in this community, participate in it don't post AI garbage
I appreciate the AI summary being removed because of the way some people were taking it, but you might have been a bit too hostile. They'd edited the comment when they saw others take AI arguments seriously and as a substitute for the video, and at the bottom they'd mentioned a Men's Lib group (the good kind) that talked about similar issues. So, I don't think they were engaging in bad faith, just unfamiliar with how AI is perceived here.
You're right, but the AI summary just muddies the discussion here. This is the Men's Lib group they linked
It is not okay.
Message received. I won't do it again.
Sorry if that was a bit aggressive, it does seem that you were trying to engage in good faith, I'm just not a fan of summarizing with LLMs unless it's for a bit. They'll never be able to actually parse the information in a video or book right and will just give you something that looks correct, but can misrepresent major parts of an argument or story.
How do you imagine that some LLM that doesn't even have access to the video would be able to summarize it? I'd give it less than a 50% chance of giving a decent summary of most novels or short stories unless you paste the whole text into the prompt. What the hell is it supposed to do about a video?
I copied and pasted the whole transcript into Claude. That's how.
But I get it. God damn.
That's interesting. Doesn't it have weird line breaks, or did you go through and fix those instead of just writing a summary yourself? At least from what I remember of retrieving a transcripts on YT recently, that's how it goes.
Then again, we're again talking about a LLM, so even if we imagine that it parses that okay for what it is, it's still just using spitballing based on aggregated data to write what it thinks is plausible-sounding on a basis of syntax, vocabulary, and formatting rather than something like concepts. It's much more the superficial level of communication than people tend to believe.