:large-adult-son:

    • Theblarglereflargle [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Wasnt that followed up by ANOTHER struggle sesh about how it’s lib shit for both sidesing Revolutions and portraying Gale as evil for doing whatever it takes to win or was that a fever dream from the old sub I had?

        • Theblarglereflargle [any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yeah my issues with the third book aside (every chapter ending on a cliffhanger, the sort of gloss over of drug abuse Snd mental illness, whatever the fuck they were trying with Gale) the series as a whole is good and has some good things to say.

      • EldritchMayo [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Personally IDK, gale's strategy was literally two tap warfare which is 100% a war crime and also not necessary to win, I don't think. The end of the war was in sight and to me it felt like that was unnecessary.

        • Theblarglereflargle [any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Oh for sure. I’m not disagreeing with that. My thing was that there’s very little build up in his character to it. There’s events that happen to him we see that we can say “oh that makes sense” but the way I remember it He basically just one day is like “ok! Time for genocide” and that’s his entire character after that point.