Permanently Deleted

  • machiavellianRecluse [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Yeah very similar to how the US was just accusing Sadam over a lack of transparency over Iraq's chemical weapons program.

    The only source they cite for all their claims is themselves. They claim that the WIV literally changed public online records. This has to be easily demonstrable. I am not sure why they wouldn't try to at least show evidence for this.

    They also cite that "open source reporting" has been used. Sounds a lot like bellingcat (which I would strongly encourage you to read about, grayzone has done a lot of interesting reporting on this).

    In any case, there is a WHO investigation going on which I imagine would be discredited in the future "for not being transparent enough or something". We might even get a few laughs.