It's really not a dumb take at all. Look at motorsports; 250cc motorcycles compete in a class of their own, and there are 250cc world champions crowned every year, even though there are much faster classes. In dragracing, cars that are capable of doing the 1/4 mile in around sixteen seconds compete among themselves, even though there are cars capable of doing the 1/4 mile in under four seconds.
The same thing could be done in many other sports: You run X miles in around Y minutes? You compete against other people who run X miles in around Y minutes, regardless of gender.
I'm a little drunk so I don't know if that makes sense, but I tried my best.
I'm not sure I get it. I don't know much about motorsports (or any sport tbh) but I assume driving differing kinds of motorcycles are different sports the same way shot putting and javelin throwing are different sports.
Just delinianiating between those who run 800m slower than 1:50 and faster 1:50 for example seems really weird and arbitrary. A person who is closest to 1:50 but not faster would win the gold.
It isn't, in motorsports as you said it has to do with the specs of the motorbikes, it is similar to weight classes. But delineating sports the way you propose would be really stupid because you're not delineating via a specific well defined feature but via outcome which doesn't make any sense in terms of sports. It would pretty much just become "who can consistently run the course in exactly 1 minutes and 50 seconds".
It is pretty hard to do for a footrace based on performance, since that can change. Weight classes or something similar would probably work better, since you can't just pretend to be lighter than you are. Having a load of athletes that learn to run 1:50 on the dot would be kind of interesting in some ways though.
Otherwise I guess they could do something similar like horse racing divisions where they add weights and shit depending on horse, jockey size and previous performances, but those are more focused around making betting more lucurative, so I'm not sure how that would mesh with sport competitions.
I've looked up the Rio Olympics results and it seems like no woman run 800m faster than any man. This means everyone competing together would lead to no women running 800m in Olympics. Same with some other sports, presumably. I'm sure that would be a big deal for many female athletes.
couldn't you just let everyone compete together? sorry if this is a dumb take I have never really thought about it
It's really not a dumb take at all. Look at motorsports; 250cc motorcycles compete in a class of their own, and there are 250cc world champions crowned every year, even though there are much faster classes. In dragracing, cars that are capable of doing the 1/4 mile in around sixteen seconds compete among themselves, even though there are cars capable of doing the 1/4 mile in under four seconds.
The same thing could be done in many other sports: You run X miles in around Y minutes? You compete against other people who run X miles in around Y minutes, regardless of gender.
I'm a little drunk so I don't know if that makes sense, but I tried my best.
I'm not sure I get it. I don't know much about motorsports (or any sport tbh) but I assume driving differing kinds of motorcycles are different sports the same way shot putting and javelin throwing are different sports.
Just delinianiating between those who run 800m slower than 1:50 and faster 1:50 for example seems really weird and arbitrary. A person who is closest to 1:50 but not faster would win the gold.
I mean, that's pretty much how it works in motorsports. And people enjoy it.
Huh. I should look it up, probably.
It isn't, in motorsports as you said it has to do with the specs of the motorbikes, it is similar to weight classes. But delineating sports the way you propose would be really stupid because you're not delineating via a specific well defined feature but via outcome which doesn't make any sense in terms of sports. It would pretty much just become "who can consistently run the course in exactly 1 minutes and 50 seconds".
It is pretty hard to do for a footrace based on performance, since that can change. Weight classes or something similar would probably work better, since you can't just pretend to be lighter than you are. Having a load of athletes that learn to run 1:50 on the dot would be kind of interesting in some ways though.
Otherwise I guess they could do something similar like horse racing divisions where they add weights and shit depending on horse, jockey size and previous performances, but those are more focused around making betting more lucurative, so I'm not sure how that would mesh with sport competitions.
I've looked up the Rio Olympics results and it seems like no woman run 800m faster than any man. This means everyone competing together would lead to no women running 800m in Olympics. Same with some other sports, presumably. I'm sure that would be a big deal for many female athletes.
See my reply above
Removed by mod
Yeah as we all know it's always the biggest guys who win and all sports are competitions of upper body strength and nothing else.
deleted by creator
Cool so no point holding a contest then just give medals out based on physical stats and nothing else.
deleted by creator
God I wish I'd watch that shit all day