:sad

  • _else [she/her,they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    this is just how I use the internet in our dystopian panopticon hell world. I literally don't go online without TOR or at least a commercial proxy nowadays.

    but being told im unwelcome in a place is a bigger deal to me than a new name. it creates a kind of opposition to a place. even if i reengage it's different, with more hostility, and a lot less respect for the people there.

    • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I definitely get that sentiment. Ideally, I think bans should be accompanied by a "you got bounced, but you're welcome to make a new account and come back in" message. We need to fight the feeling you're describing while maintaining some way to frustrate trolls/wreckers/incorrigibles.

      • _else [she/her,they/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        yeah but after a while its just kind of.. everywhere. it becomes a default in places that aren't explicitly inclusive, and those include people whose inclusion that excludes me.

        • hogposting [he/him,comrade/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          My understanding is that we can't really ban people permanently. We don't do IP bans (which can be circumvented anyways), so as long as a user doesn't (1) keep doing bannable stuff or (2) make it apparent that they're a banned user, they can easily get back in.

          So why not do warnings, temp bans, etc.? It adds a whole layer of administrative work for the mods and a bunch more opportunities for people to dispute how they've been treated. A system that creates a bunch of work isn't a great one, and we want to have a way to push back on shitty behavior without causing tons of "I've been treated so unfairly!" drama. Making bans less of a big deal would accomplish both, and (because we can't perma ban people anyway) it would have the same effect on more persistent assholes.