These people about to grillpill themselves unto wikipedia's "Apocalyptic groups" Category page

  • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I don't get that reverent tone they extend towards matt at all, honestly. Like, ya, some of his rants are fascinating to listen to - deciphering borderline incoherent ramblings often are, in that game of code-breaking sorta way. Not exactly breaking new ground though, is he. More like grandiose oversimplifications born from his individual experiences. Which is valid, but to form a little cult clubhouse around it..? I mean, let your parasocial freak-flag fly, but it seems like a waste of time

      • SteamedHamberder [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Yeah. He’s very talented with analogies and has a very good knowledge of American History, Cinema, and Prestige TV. But imagine making a serious life decision based on one of his rants. I originally subbed over there after the CTH ban, but all the posts are either “l used to be constantly online, upvote me because I’m not.” Or Talmudic-level meta-analyses of Matt’s free associating livestreams.

      • BigLadKarlLiebknecht [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        The few times I’ve tried watching his streams I feel like all I heard was the Chuck Schumer quote about “For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania...” being filtered through post-modernist waffling and then presented as a new theory of American politics. That and some inscrutable stuff about finding the meaning to life after taking acid.

        I haven’t listened to the pod in a long time, but his streams felt to me almost at odds with Matt’s presence there, where he can be genuinely novel, insightful and interesting.