Permanently Deleted

  • UlyssesT
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    deleted by creator

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I've always read the Borg as a criticism of Star Trek fans who took the wrong message from the show. The Borg initially in the first few episodes didn't assimilate people, they only cared about taking technology. Their ships are technological masterpieces but have no function other than to make more of itself. The first drone the Enterprise encounters disregards the characters and only cares about figuring out how the spaceship works.

      I took this as a criticism of Star Trek fans who disregard the humanity of the show, who disregard the social messages and instead focus entirely on the cool spaceships and teleporters. The Borg are like if the Federation never cared about social causes or equality. That's why they make such good parallels. The Federation hates how the Borg disregard humanity, the Bord don't understand why humanity is important if you can be a machine.

      • UlyssesT
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        deleted by creator

        • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, scifi fans will get caught up in the trivia of how future technology functions, rather than any other features of the story. It's frustrating. Endless debates about space battles or how warp drives work. They'll treat the genre like it's Dragonball Z. That stuff can be interesting, but the meat of scifi is always about humanity now and how humanity might progress (for better or worse)

          • UlyssesT
            hexagon
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            deleted by creator

    • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That's possible. I know for sure at least some of the writers are self identified dem socs. What I personally think happened was using the word "collective" was how they sold the idea to the executive that was calling all the shots on the show. Star Trek writers and actors are notorious for intentionally going behind the backs of their executives and forcing through the messaging or artistic vision that they had.

      For instance, like when Rick Berman forced them to make Elim Garak a straight character and literally everyone involved in the show, actors, writers etc. went forward with making the character gay without the producer noticing.

      • UlyssesT
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        deleted by creator

        • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          All the other shows Berman was involved with were filled with conflict between him and the creative talent so I 100% believe that happened. Almost everything good in star trek was a battle the creative labor fought for and won against the producer (or snuck behind their back and did anyway). Thankfully Berman was a moron and lost constantly.

          • UlyssesT
            hexagon
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            deleted by creator

            • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That really did suck. I didn't mind the person who replaced them, and they made the best of the situation, but that was real shitty. He did the exact same thing to the person playing kes around the same time too.