cyberleft21 [he/him] to main • edit-24 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square174 fedilinkarrow-up1159file-text
arrow-up1159external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashcyberleft21 [he/him] to main • edit-24 years agomessage-square174 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecamaron28 [he/him]hexbear9·edit-24 years agoYeah, i'm sure they prefer dumping oil in their lakes and destroying their forests. link
minus-squarejack [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear2·4 years agoYou can scale up solar and wind faster, cheaper, and more safely than nuclear as a replacement to fossil fuels link
minus-squarecamaron28 [he/him]hexbear8·4 years agoYes, i'd absolutely love that since I live in a place that would produce tons of energy with the wind. But nuclear produces way more. Sorry, but i'm a centrist in this issue. link
minus-squarejack [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear2·4 years agoBetween the four main renewable energy sources of solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro, you have way more power available than nuclear. Especially from solar. link
Yeah, i'm sure they prefer dumping oil in their lakes and destroying their forests.
You can scale up solar and wind faster, cheaper, and more safely than nuclear as a replacement to fossil fuels
Yes, i'd absolutely love that since I live in a place that would produce tons of energy with the wind.
But nuclear produces way more.
Sorry, but i'm a centrist in this issue.
Between the four main renewable energy sources of solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro, you have way more power available than nuclear. Especially from solar.