Is anyone saying he isn't? Bellingcat get their funding from NED(CIA) and Integrity Initative (a british propaganda unit)
Wikispooks article on bellingcat is great
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Bellingcat
Anyone else kinda skeeved out about how he's basically training kids to work for bellingcat now too? He met this kid at the protests while he was covering them, this kid went on his podcast, and now he's starting writing for bellingcat :|
https://twitter.com/hungrybowtie
I've said before i don't think he's a fed, but yo that's fucking fed shit right there. A charitable mind would be like, oh of course he's just giving a young investigative journalist a leg up but idk ya'll, idk :side-eye-1:
Also reminder why Robert Evans is sus outside of bellingcat https://twitter.com/IwriteOK/status/1194094729962672128
It's almost as if his coverage of domestic events is used to give himself credence when he says things like "oh golly, it's hard to tell if this Bolivia thing is a coup".
You know what, yes, you are right, there probably are good people who work for the CIA and we shouldn't just throw them all in a prison camp.
Yes, you are right once again , there is no difference between an intelligence analyst and the barista who works at the Starbucks in the CIAa HQ.
Whom amongst us hasn't taken a little govt money? Not that many places pay for overseas reporting. Bellingcat seems like a stovepipe outfit, but Evans' articles for Bellingcat are all about domestic right-wing extremism. Is there anything egregious in his foreign reporting? Like does he obviously elide the neo-nazis in Ukraine? https://twitter.com/IwriteOK/status/1194861639926829056
Was domestic unrest encouraged by the IC to undermine Trump?
I don't think Evans is an asset to the same degree as someone like Bob Woodward.
No, it isn't? If you want to be more conservative, you could say "wage covert information warfare against Russia", but the critical part of the headline is the compromised nature of media organizations that claim to have the highest standards of journalistic quality and integrity.
That's a fair gripe, but the actual quote is “weaken the Russian State’s influence on its near neighbours”, not the UK, so you're doing a bit of misleading yourself ;-). And because it's 'weaken Russia's influence by inserting UK/US influence' it's not benign/defensive the way it sounds without context. So "weaken Russia" shouldn't be in quotes, but it's a fair summary of the article's content.
The leaked documents page they link to also accuses the skripal poisoning of being a British op, I do not trust that site lol.