Permanently Deleted

  • garbology [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Also, because the khrushchyovka were supposed to be temporary, the USSR didn't do much maintenance on them. Then, post-91, none of the post-soviet states will do maintenance on them because "why bother, commie blocks are ugly anyway". So it's been a self-fulfilling message. They're ugly so don't maintain them, so they become ugly so don't maintain them...

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      They aren't even that ugly. Spartan maybe, I'd prefer some nice arty touches, but a Soviet housing district looks fine. It's just the west always photographs them at 3pm in February rather than high spring when the trees and flowers are out in the courtyards.

      • CommunistDog [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        That's been bothering me for a while. Yeah, everything looks grey and shitty in the middle of winter. When you see pictures during the spring and summer where everything is green they look beautiful.

    • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      That's sad to hear. I'm going to assume the same line of reasoning is used here in the states in regards to public housing too.

      • garbology [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Hmm, I actually don't know if there are racial implications to who lives in commie blocks in ex-soviet states, I think it's usually just old people. If there isn't, then that part at least is a bit different from the US public housing defunding narrative, which is definitely in part racist.