So in the UK the tories and media keep saying the national debt is the highest its been since the ww2 (which is true of pretty much any year since the 80s). And that we need to raise taxes, tighten our belts etc to pay back what we borrowed to get us thru the pandemic.
Now I know this kind of treating a countries finances like household finances and talking about national debt like its credit card debt is disingenuous and just used as a way to justify squeezing people more than they are already.
But what I don't know with enough authority to be able to talk to people about it is why this is the case? How is national debt different and wtf is it? Who do we owe it to and do we even need to pay it back etc?
Ofc I know the whole thing is bullshit anyway any only exists to preserve the current power structure but let's leave that for now.
Be good to hear thoughts from someone who knows things.
Then read the book lol. Direct quotes from the book:
[...]
It's free and only 90 pages or so.
Bonds have expiration dates and interest you have to pay. No one has to come and tell the US "hey you have to pay up". It's literally written on the bond. If the US stops paying that then it's a default, it doesn't even have to be "officially" announced by the party defaulting, the announcement is not the important part. If you can find just one case where the US failed to pay up these obligations by all means share it. Srsly this hurts my brain just google this stuff lol
this isn't at all in opposition to what i'm telling you. if you don't think that nukes are a form of capital you're not thinking
I have no clue how that is relevant. You're saying imperialism came before capitalism and that somehow this is what the book said. It is not.
Also I asked you to give me one instance where the US failed to pay its bonds, and you posted an article of the US breaking pacts. That's not the same, pls learn the difference. Read your link. Where does it say "defaulted on debt"?
Read the book here: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/imperialism.pdf
Read this to learn how bonds work: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/treasurybond.asp
There is also bills and notes which are similar but shorter term than bonds, which last for years. Read this to learn about the rest of them: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/073113/introduction-treasury-securities.asp
The US spends hundreds of billions of dollars of its budget for debt service, in particular debt interest is almost 10% of the federal budget. The US has an AAA credit rating, it wouldn't if it didn't pay up on the bonds. If it didn't, the US would have defaulted, it is literally the definition of defaulting, and that has never happened. Read the links. Again, none of what I'm saying is controversial.
the us is in charge of it's own credit rating and can fucking raise the debt ceiling whenever it wants. it's a fucking joke dude.
So you're still insisting that the US isn't servicing its debt? Where's the hundreds of billions of dollars dedicated for exactly that in their budget going to exactly? Why is no one saying "the US isn't servicing their debt to me"? Can you find one country or one person or whatever saying that they bought US bonds and they're not receiving their payments? Why are people even buying US bonds if the US isn't servicing them? When did the US default?
i'm saying that none of the money matters because we have so many fucking nukes that we control the global currency.
No, you have been saying something completely different, ie that the US isn't servicing debt because it has so many nukes that no one dares to ask for the money they are owed, which makes no sense and isn't how national debt works at all. That is much different from saying "it doesn't matter because the US controls the world reserve currency" which is what I am guessing you mean by "global currency". The dollar being the main world reserve currency means the US can borrow at low interest, and yes, that's partly why the US can manage a large debt, but it doesn't mean the US can ignore the debt. It just doesn't have to pay as much interest. Also the dollar isn't the world reserve currency primarily because countries are afraid of nukes but whatever. I won't go into that.
So @dukeofprunes does that answer your question?
Aint got round to reading all this yet haha
Maybe don't for your mental health lol
deleted by creator
I am saying you have a very wrong perception of national debt and a completely wrong appraisal of how imperialism works and you are just ignoring everything said about it. I never said imperialism is not of enormous significance. But just because you recognize that, you know, imperialism is a thing and of paramount importance doesn't necessarily mean you know what you are talking about or that you have a correct picture of how all that stuff connects, because pretty much everything you said about the national debt was wrong and for some reason you keep insisting on ignoring that. If you don't really know how something works, no one is forcing you to have a take on it, and if you do, you don't have to keep insisting on wrong stuff after it has been explained to you why they are wrong.
deleted by creator
It's not about buying the math. It's about understanding how stuff works. You're making up stuff about the national debt (and about Lenin) which are simply false. I'm begging you to read theory. "I'm not buying their math so I can just make up whatever kinda seems to me like it might make some sense without looking into it further" is not a viable standpoint. It's very clear you only know about this stuff from memes and you've synthesised it all into some kind of nonsense monster.
if you don't see how the national debt of the most imperialistic country relates to the defense budget of the most imperialistic country of the earth and it's relation to the most impoverished countries on earth, then you're missing a very large part of the entire idea of imperialism.
you seem to be under the belief that the debt is completely unrelated to the arsenal a country has.
Oh I see, you don't see it because you don't understand what national debt is. Yes, debt is almost entirely unrelated to the arsenal a country has. The only relation is that the US can borrow with very low interest rates because of how financially trustworthy it is seen, and how much of the world uses the dollar as a reserve currency, which are all things that hinge upon the US being the global hegemon and very powerful financially, which in turn are because of imperialism. But it is not because the US doesn't have to service its debts. It's the opposite. You think the US doesn't have to service the debts because of imperialism, where actually the US is ABLE to service the debts because of imperialism (mostly, there's also other reasons). Japan and Singapore have no issues servicing debts either despite having much higher debts compared to GDP than the US, it isn't because they are threatening anyone to write off their debts either. There is much more to debt than that.
it's seen as financially trustworthy because it can raise it's debt ceiling whenever the fuck it wants because of it's military capabilities.
Simply not the case. This was explained. The US services all debt. It's not threatening anyone into writing off debts. Ever. It can service the debt because it has a robust economy, very low interest rates, and national debt isn't as big a deal as people pretend anyways. The aforementioned do mostly hinge on imperialism but not the way you think. I'm not sure you know what a debt ceiling is.
If you can find just one case where the US failed to pay up these obligations by all means share it.