John Reed, born on this day in 1887, was an American journalist, poet, and communist activist. Reed served as a war correspondent, covered strikes, interviewed Pancho Villa, and was an eyewitness to the October Revolution.

Reed was raised in an upper-class environment in the Pacific Northwest during the turn of the 20th century. He graduated from Harvard and showed interest in social issues, attending socialist club meetings. Three years after completing his studies he landed a job with the New York-based leftist magazine The Masses, which published articles by prominent radicals of the time.

As a determined champion of social justice, Reed covered strikes by silk mill workers in New Jersey and coal miners in Colorado. He was then sent to report on the Mexican revolution (1910 - 1920). He was appalled by the exploitation of laborers and Washington’s policy towards Mexico. "The United States Government is really headed toward the policy of ‘civilizing 'em with a Krag’ [a rifle used by American troops] - a process which consists in forcing upon alien races with alien temperaments our own Grand Democratic Institutions: I refer to Trust Government, Unemployment, and Wage Slavery," Reed wrote.

His series on Mexico, later published as a book titled Insurgent Mexico, enforced Reed's reputation as a war correspondent. When World War I broke out in Europe Reed traveled to the Continent on two occasions, resulting in his second book - The War in Eastern Europe.

However, his most famous work - Ten Days That Shook The World - was not about war, but rebellion. It was published in 1919 and described the events of the Russian revolution. Reed visited Russia in August 1917 and witnessed how the Bolsheviks seized power. He welcomed the uprising and was an enthusiastic supporter of the new socialist regime. "So, with the crash of artillery, in the dark, with hatred, and fear, and reckless daring, new Russia was being born," he wrote.

He met the two main leaders of the Bolshevik uprising in person, Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky, and was a big fan of the Bolshevik party. "Instead of being a destructive force, it seems to me that the Bolsheviki were the only party in Russia with a constructive program and the power to impose it on the country," Reed wrote in Ten Days That Shook The World.

The book was also widely praised by the public - even American diplomat George F. Kennan, who had no sympathy towards the Soviets - gave it a positive review: "Reed’s account of the events of that time rises above every other contemporary record for its literary power, its penetration, its command of detail."

Reed subsequently made a trip back to the U.S., where he vehemently defended the new Soviet Republic and was arrested three times, the last for violating the Sedition Act. After being acquitted, Reed returned to the USSR and again met with Lenin and Trotsky.

Reed died from spotted typhus while trying to return to the United States in 1920. He was given a state funeral and buried at the Kremlin Wall Necropolis.

Ten Days that Shook the World USSR

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A few weeks ago I was at a party and something happened that legit sounds like an "and then everyone clapped" story

    CW: transphobia

    I was hanging out with 4 other guys on the balcony and they were talking about classic dude shit, yknow how it is. Talking about what kind of girls they most wanna fuck. Anyway, this one guy starts talking about how he was watching porn or something and then the girl turns around and "WTF it was a (slur for trans people)". The other guys all laugh and draw faces. One of them says "Would you rather fuck a (t-slur) or a 70-year-old woman" and at that point I confidently say something along the lines of "Are you kidding me dude, trans girl of course, I know a bunch of them and they're really hot."

    Suddenly, one of the other guys who just before was drawing a face at the idea, says "For real dude, no joke, there's some out there that are hotter than cis women" (he didn't say cis women but thats what he meant). Another guy nods in agreement and suddenly any pretense of "trans girls ew" is completely gone.

    Now these guys said some abhorrent shit, and reducing trans girls to being fuckable isn't exactly being an ally. But still, I find it interesting how the transphobia on display here was seemingly purely performative in nature. The one guy clearly found trans girls hot from the start but had to pretend otherwise because he didn't want to be seen as gay or less manly, but as soon as I went against the consensus in the room he jumped on the opportunity to agree with me. And from the complete lack of disagreement from the other guys, it seemed like none of them really had any strong feelings about it, not even the guy who originally told his story (who, fun fact, later went on to drunkenly slap my ass).

    I am a tall guy who speaks with a lot of conviction and I think my attitude of "What are you talking about, of course trans girls are hot, open your eyes dude" had a big impact there. The certainty with which I said it was what shifted the vibe. I had the strongest opinion on the matter, so the other guys kinda just went with what I said.

    Later I told one of the guys that I'm actually a detransitioner and lived as a trans woman for 2 years, you can't imagine his face lmao

    • JuryNullification [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every conversation between 3 or more cishet men in their late teens/early twenties is 100% performative masculinity