Fairly sure the PMCs there are meant to be pro UNITA (one of them is literally led by a British aristocrat lmao), but I could be wrong.
Sidenote but it always kind of bothered me in MGS V that they were obstencibly set in active warzones but your character was the only threat. Would have been interesting to see dynamic skirmishes between the Soviets and Taliban or whatever, especially as they already had the "sneaking through a battle" dynamic in MGS4. I'm just rambling here but yeah, haha.
Fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan but also pro UNITA mercenaries in Angola is the ultimate "playing both sides so I always end up on top" move.
Unfortunately, UNITA was supported by the US and South Africa after 1975, which means snake was supporting the US on both occasions
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I honestly don't remember who you fight in angola in mgsv tbh
Fairly sure the PMCs there are meant to be pro UNITA (one of them is literally led by a British aristocrat lmao), but I could be wrong.
Sidenote but it always kind of bothered me in MGS V that they were obstencibly set in active warzones but your character was the only threat. Would have been interesting to see dynamic skirmishes between the Soviets and Taliban or whatever, especially as they already had the "sneaking through a battle" dynamic in MGS4. I'm just rambling here but yeah, haha.
Dummied out for the 360 and ps3 probs
Ahh yeah, that's probably it actually.
deleted by creator
cool
I always equip non-lethal weapons ins Afghanistan missions and do the exact opposite in Angola ones lol
Literally same lmao