For the most part, this is a good, informative video about the advantages of nuclear energy.
Then, at 9:00 they talk about the danger of nuclear weapon proliferation. Obviously, this is a scary subject and requires scary footage. Guess what they chose?
Nuclear weapons test footage?
No.
Muslims praying.
Marg Bar The Economist.
I'll hear you say that when they drop a bomb on a long term nuclear waste storage, or when the Marshall Islands flood. Maybe you have a different standard or "harm" but I'm happy to hear it.
They being...?
Like, no one would actually do this and no one who would will ever have the capacity to do so.
Does it matter? The US dropped nukes before , what would stop them from bombing a waste site?
I'm getting the sense you know absolutely nothing about nuclear energy and nuclear waste storage.
You don't even need to bomb them, but whatever. I'm getting the sense you are trolling. Boy, bye!
Tell me how a metal rod encaced in concrete, burried thousands of feet underground, surrounded by radiation shielding, in the middle of the desert, is going to hurt you.
And yet this has never caused a problem in the decades-long history of nuclear energy production.
And yet we have the technology for safe containment.
No, which is why you have state-run nuclear power systems. Besides, your concern was the technology, which objectively does exist to the level we can generate nuclear energy safely.
Chernobyl was also impossible until it happened.
Where was my concern the technology?