:bruh-moment:

  • Audeamus [any]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Serious reply: they didn't. Only Romans and/or Constantinopolitans (citizens of the capital) got the bread and circuses and it was barely enough to survive on. The grain dole was means-tested, too. The only welfare available to the ~95% rural population was free burial.

    • AlexandairBabeuf [they/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      ahem those ungrateful rurals have the government to thank for their border security, economic opportunity, and thermae. if they hate it so much they should go join the fuckin limitanei or work in a fabrica.

      • mazdak
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • AlexandairBabeuf [they/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          most roman cities woulda looked & smelled like shit. buildings that come down to us look nice but they were state-funded & rich people shit. regular buildings would be p disappointing. it would be super cool to live in a bustling hive like Rome when it wasn't having a plague tho, walkability + high density = good time.

          • mazdak
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • AlexandairBabeuf [they/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              aesthetic consistency was certainly more of a thing; today you can find dozens of beautiful buildings in a city but many are beautiful in different ways.

              a whole city built in art deco or brutalism for instance could easily look better than palmyra, so its not like people forgot how to make things look nice. cities have just grown fast & art movements change fast so we get smatterings of good in basically every city along with tonnes of shit. places like Paris too have their share of ugly outside of the imperial bits.