God you people are predictable. The second people call you out you scream “lib”.
The funny thing is for all your spleen venting John Oliver has undoubtedly done more to advance the goals of the American left than you ever have. He has introduced basic left wing talking points about race, the economy, history, societal structures and the deep systemic flaws within and made them palatable and easy to understand for the average American citizen (amazingly the average American is not a Twitter Bolshevik).
I actually credit John Oliver with helping me become more left. Because of his videos on the subject I wanted to learn more left wing things and I discovered Lindsay Ellis, then Shaun, then from Shaun Contrapoints and from her Three Arrows and then philosophy tube and Some More News, renegade cut. All because a funny comedian met me where I was at and got me interested in politics.
(I can't wait for you to explain to me how all those people are actually sucky sellout libs).
If you actually want leftist goals to succeed you have to convince the average person to adopt leftist beliefs and that means conversing with them on their level.
I seriously don’t understand what wannabe revolutionaries like you sneering and sniping at people online and demeaning them and calling them shitty libs actually accomplishes.
Do you think they’ll stick around and listen to your brilliant theory analysis after you basically told them to go fuck themselves?
Is it praxis to be on par with a dead pigs rotten asshole in terms of charisma and charm?
Or are you actually seriously delusional enough to think that there are enough of you and you are well organised enough to bypass electoralism all together and have a revolutionary war?
(🎵DOOONT STOP BELIEEEEVIN’🎵)
But whatever you think, as you are now you are not the solution to the lefts problem, rather you are an annoying parasite that alienates fence sitters, causes infighting and validates right wing narratives.
And the only reason you do it is entirely for selfish reasons. So that you get to feel intellectually and ethically superior to others.
Grow up and leave the tankie larping to the playground!
I am not sinophobic wtf lol you might be Islamophobic though. Look I know that many instances of “radical Islamic terrorism” have occurred in Xinjiang and it’s a contentious region, but if you think any government on the planet won’t lump a few innocent members of a group in with the bad actors you are very naive, to say “no crimes against humanity” are occurring so definitely is to assume that China is the first country to ever 100% accurately ascertain who is and who isn’t a radical. I’m sure they do better than the US did domestically post-9/11 but you seem certain that they’ve nailed it perfectly. Very strange.
I’m well-aware the United States (and France to a somewhat lesser degree) commits many indefensible acts and I know Zenz is an evangelical CIA kook. Still, your response feels unnecessarily combative and anyone reading it should be weary of anyone claiming to know the “ultimate truth” like you are with your comment:
I’m not in denial of anything here, I’m certain the CIA is bad, yet I’m also not 100% convinced China is perfectly innocent here like you seem to be. Also you have to know shit sounds like CCP propaganda the other way:
What does that even mean?
Those last 2 literally read like PR statements lol trust me I realize the CIA interferes with China in a major way but if you can’t see the value in questioning it’s activity in the region then you’re not being impartial yourself. And again fuck outta here accusing me of being sinophobic for posting in good faith.
-Soulja
There are no crimes against humanity occurring, nor are there any proven to be occurring. I would say that you erring on the side of "China bad" is wrong here, and reveals deeper-seated biases on the face of it
Yes, the CIA is bad, and whether you're 100% convinced or not is immaterial in the context of admitting that the CIA tailors foreign news stories & stokes unrest and insurrectionary separatist splinter cells in foreign countries. Whether you think it's combative that someone is skeptical of your doubling-down even after admitting Zenz' lies & CIA meddling, I think you need to examine more closely here
https://qz.com/1954520/china-says-it-saved-uyghur-women-from-being-baby-making-machines/
Offering family planning & women's healthcare in these historically underdeveloped region is a sign of modernity & uplift extended to these places. To assume it's something else is to against err on the side of feudalistic backwardness rather than real social cohesion & integration of these people's into the unified whole.
CPC has sovereign control in the places & those People have to manage their own affairs. I will err on the side of China's unity & stability as PRC has always been a multi-ethnic & multi-national polity.
The CIA intervenes in a major way. You admit that. Nothing else really matters without any evidence.
I don't think you intend to be hateful in your remarks, but reverting back to anti-communist bias without any real evidence of "crimes" in Xinjiang (outside of Salafi jihadist violence) is not Leftism or nuance or even-handedness. It's just a kneejerk reaction & "Otherization" of the specific context in PRC