Yeah the disengagement rule does seem a bit of a jerryrigged work around for the lack of a block user function but yeah the rest of that is your big standard struggle session fare you get used to it.
It makes no sense that a user can make a claim like "veganism is racist" and say they're done with the conversation in the same comment, then whoever replies to that gets a warning or a ban.
Yeah I've got an old thread in /c/userunion about how the RtD must be invoked in a clean break from the argument as opposed to a comment baiting further response like that.
Yeah the disengagement rule does seem a bit of a jerryrigged work around for the lack of a block user function but yeah the rest of that is your big standard struggle session fare you get used to it.
It makes no sense that a user can make a claim like "veganism is racist" and say they're done with the conversation in the same comment, then whoever replies to that gets a warning or a ban.
Yeah I've got an old thread in /c/userunion about how the RtD must be invoked in a clean break from the argument as opposed to a comment baiting further response like that.
this one