A common sentiment is that if glasses were more stigmatized and prohibitively expensive than they already can be, then their users very well could fall under this specific definition of "disabled" in question.
That, but a disability can also just be so because it requires accommodations from others. People with glasses don't really need accommodations past the glasses (or at least afaik).
A common sentiment is that if glasses were more stigmatized and prohibitively expensive than they already can be, then their users very well could fall under this specific definition of "disabled" in question.
That, but a disability can also just be so because it requires accommodations from others. People with glasses don't really need accommodations past the glasses (or at least afaik).