First genuine insult someones given a take of mine on this site! :red-fist:
All polling 'science' boils down to how a group of libs/chuds feel on any give day haha it's not great, and it's not terrible. I've taken a university-level statistics course I so do understand at least the basics. It's fair to question the validity of opinion polling without just globally condemning "data scientists" imo haha.
Maybe you underestimate the power of cold reads! They're a pretty powerful thing, especially between two people who are being open with one another. Think less 'magic/crazy people I disagree with' and more 'counselor/therapist/psychiatrist getting a strong enough sense of who a person is in ~15 minutes to be able to help them'.
This shitposting comment chain that began with "FiveThirtyEight is tarot for straight men" now demands academic rigour!
You haven't said anything substantive beyond 'con men doing cold readings'. I think we both agree that stats are valuable, just trying to point out that that particular mode of communication can be valuable. Have a good one!
First genuine insult someones given a take of mine on this site! :red-fist:
All polling 'science' boils down to how a group of libs/chuds feel on any give day haha it's not great, and it's not terrible. I've taken a university-level statistics course I so do understand at least the basics. It's fair to question the validity of opinion polling without just globally condemning "data scientists" imo haha.
Maybe you underestimate the power of cold reads! They're a pretty powerful thing, especially between two people who are being open with one another. Think less 'magic/crazy people I disagree with' and more 'counselor/therapist/psychiatrist getting a strong enough sense of who a person is in ~15 minutes to be able to help them'.
Without anything more substantive than 'lol haha chuds imo haha' and liberal use of scare quotes...
This shitposting comment chain that began with "FiveThirtyEight is tarot for straight men" now demands academic rigour!
You haven't said anything substantive beyond 'con men doing cold readings'. I think we both agree that stats are valuable, just trying to point out that that particular mode of communication can be valuable. Have a good one!
"Just a prank bro!"
bro! how substantive!
trying to have it both ways lol
:sweat droplets:
What's that supposed to indicate? John Edwards scammed a widow out of her SS check and you messed your pants?
DUNK AFTER DUNK IT DOESN'T STOP
no matter how hard you try to disengage