I think its interesting that people are so enamored with certain historical figures that their words are treated as gospel, and like the Bible, they alter and morph words to new meanings. Context evolves over time, you don't need to worship anyone.
MLK is just a blank slate for liberals to launder feelings of righteousness towards whatever contemporary position they need to support. Which conveniently never includes liberation movements, poverty alleviation, or civil rights.
The white moderate is puppeteering the foggy memory of MLK into serving oppression. Any figure they can't do that with will get the Stalin treatment.
I relistened to his recorded speeches last year, highly recommend
It is unbelievable how nothing has changed, all of his criticisms and rage are still completely valid. The absolute inane myth of " the so-called progressive party "
Lenin has been continually proven correct for the past century:
During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it.
I think invoking Lenin might be perceived as too dangerous for them, better to try and let him fade away while they pat themselves on the back for invoking MLK, Ghandi, or Nelson Mandela
I think it's that they can pigeonhole antiracist or national liberation figures like those you listed into those issues alone, while ignoring their broader socialist politics. Lenin was a communist first and foremost, so it's harder to sanitize.
Like the way liberals love to pull out one random Marx quote as though that counters his every argument. So what? He wasn't a prophet and his words aren't scripture that doesn't mean you can discount everything he had to say
I think its interesting that people are so enamored with certain historical figures that their words are treated as gospel, and like the Bible, they alter and morph words to new meanings. Context evolves over time, you don't need to worship anyone.
MLK is just a blank slate for liberals to launder feelings of righteousness towards whatever contemporary position they need to support. Which conveniently never includes liberation movements, poverty alleviation, or civil rights.
The white moderate is puppeteering the foggy memory of MLK into serving oppression. Any figure they can't do that with will get the Stalin treatment.
Malcolm X never lived to see the government fall
But the state he opposed made him a stamp
Maybe that's the best you can hope for if you never give up:
Your enemies will teach your corpse to dance
I relistened to his recorded speeches last year, highly recommend
It is unbelievable how nothing has changed, all of his criticisms and rage are still completely valid. The absolute inane myth of " the so-called progressive party "
thinking about when capital used MLK to sell Dodge Ram trucks at the super bowl
Lenin has been continually proven correct for the past century:
Ironically not really the case with Lenin, even if it's true of others.
A lot of libs think Lenin was okay but Stalin went too far, which is close if you squint.
I think invoking Lenin might be perceived as too dangerous for them, better to try and let him fade away while they pat themselves on the back for invoking MLK, Ghandi, or Nelson Mandela
I think it's that they can pigeonhole antiracist or national liberation figures like those you listed into those issues alone, while ignoring their broader socialist politics. Lenin was a communist first and foremost, so it's harder to sanitize.
deleted by creator
Like the way liberals love to pull out one random Marx quote as though that counters his every argument. So what? He wasn't a prophet and his words aren't scripture that doesn't mean you can discount everything he had to say