I'm trying to find an essay, research, or any deeper analysis about why some people, most often conservatives, don't understand film. One of my FB friends posted this meme and it got me thinking about this phenomena.
Some people watch a film* and take the characters and the story completely at face value. They don't see any deeper message from the director. They don't understand that Goodfellas for example, is not a film about a couple of cool guys. Scorsese is not endorsing their behavior or their values.
Any help diving deeper into this topic is appreciated.
*By the way, you could say the same for literature, but since most people don't read past high school. I wanted to focus my question on film.
ETA: Thanks everyone for engaging with me. I've been a lurker and commenter since the early Reddit days, this was my first post.
for whatever reason, i was looking at an analysis of grapes of wrath, the john steinbeck novel. the book is filled to the brim with pro-labor/pro-worker messages, is about workers in the great depression, mentions marx and lenin by name. the entire book is very pro-union.
yet this one analysis i saw said that when a character strangles a baby turtle, that "represents the stranglehold of communism" ???? my brain exploded reading that. why would a book that takes place in the great depression NOT be about...yknow the stranglehold of capitalism? lol
IIRC Steinbeck named the book something patriotic because he feared his book getting blacklisted for communism.
deleted by creator