No this is a bad take. Food should be cheap, but workers should be paid well. These are not an either or situation (which is what I think you're suggesting in your comment). Government has the responsibility to keep necessities affordable, so food workers should be compensated, and food should be sold at a set, subsidized price.
What you just said is a bad and horribly informed take
America has some of the cheapest food in the world. And some of the most cucked citizens. All of the garbage Americans consume, corn and soy is heavily subsided. If not food costs for Americans would be above the AVG of 8% of their budget
No this is a bad take. Food should be cheap, but workers should be paid well. These are not an either or situation (which is what I think you're suggesting in your comment). Government has the responsibility to keep necessities affordable, so food workers should be compensated, and food should be sold at a set, subsidized price.
What you just said is a bad and horribly informed take
America has some of the cheapest food in the world. And some of the most cucked citizens. All of the garbage Americans consume, corn and soy is heavily subsided. If not food costs for Americans would be above the AVG of 8% of their budget
So which am I wrong about, that food should be cheap, or that food workers should be paid well?