Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]

An anarchist here to ask asinine questions about the USSR. At least I was when I got here.

she/xe/it/thon/seraph | NO/EN/RU/JP

  • 334 Posts
  • 3.35K Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年8月18日

help-circle




  • My impression is that within East or SE Asia, anime could be considered a form of Japanese cultural imperialism, however outside of that region I really wouldn't say so. I'd like to hear what people from East/SE Asia have to say about things like Chinese "ACG" culture and attitudes towards it, though, since I'd prefer not to talk out my ass. Japanese music -- on the subject of Japanese cultural exports -- I know was actually banned in South Korea until the 1990s, with the supremely based Soul Flower Union being the first Japanese band to perform in South Korea (and North Korea!) after the ban was lifted, for whatever that's worth.

    In Norway my own line is that anime is actually a form of US cultural imperialism which also comprises a form of Japanese soft power.

    Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837

    Treaty with the Sioux of September 29th, 1837

    "We Will Talk of Nothing Else": Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837












  • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]toSlop.Kojima-san... woke baka
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    I frankly thought it was very weird for you to assume that the omission of the "is" was a deliberate racist stylistic choice, rather than a sign that the writer themself didn't speak English as a first language, so I did some digging to find out where Istana Angin is from. As it turns out, they're from Malaysia; and as it also turns out, Malay tends not to form copular sentences with an equivalent of "to be".

    So it would seem my intuition was right.

    Also, I don't get why someone's use of capitals, dashes, and spaces when romanizing a language that does not use capitals, dashes, or spaces should be a point of judgment... Like, what, is this person making Mr. James Curtis Hepburn turn in his grave by writing "San" instead of "-san"?

    Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837

    Treaty with the Sioux of September 29th, 1837

    "We Will Talk of Nothing Else": Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837





  • It makes my blood boil. I can practically feel the drool of capitalist ghouls salivating at the thought of forcing a third world war — they can barely conceal their glee about their own profits and the preservation of their dictatorship through words about a "deteriorating security situation" even though they brought that "deterioration" upon themselves.

    And now, it seems, the capitalist ghouls will convince people that risks are more real than they are, by building bunkers, and mailing pamphlets, and putting aircraft carriers in our harbors, and tripling the number of American military bases in Norway, and doing military exercises in the middle of dense urban centers, et cetera et cetera et cetera. The people of Europe generally trust their governments still, so they would see all of these things happening around them and assume that it must be for "a good reason", right? Because it would be an awful lot of effort to just be "theater", right?

    Thus when the people are trusting of their own government, they are easily scared; and when the naïve are terrified, they're more willing to accept this sort of absolute nonsense, the idea of a "preemptive strike" in this case, which will surely trigger or bring us within inches of a third world war.

    "For the sake of security" — Give me a break!

    Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837

    Treaty with the Sioux of September 29th, 1837

    "We Will Talk of Nothing Else": Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837