KantNeverCould [any]

  • 0 Posts
  • 108 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 9th, 2021

help-circle

  • KantNeverCould [any]tomemes:sicko-yes: :amerikkka:
    ·
    4 years ago

    Conservatives are having kids! It's liberals worried about the baby bust. In the past, they could rely on the global South sending migrants our way to boost their numbers. Now that no one wants to move to this shithole country, Liberals are worried about being outbred.




  • KantNeverCould [any]toMain*Permanently Deleted*
    ·
    4 years ago

    Lmao you're lucky they waited this long. When I was in school, the expectation was that you would sign a lease for next school year in late September/early October of the previous year!


  • You're have a far, far, far too pessimistic view of society that completely fucks up your perception of reality. The Left in general has this as a persistent problem....... We're always the first to freak out over shit, the last to get out heads out of our asses, and persistently falling behind the eight ball. It's completely against the idea of "dialectical thinking" to always be repeating whatever bullshit nonsense the Democrats said in the past and try to hold them to account, but we keep doing it anyway.

    Most Americans do not rent. If your thinking in terms of "making rent", you've already lost. Most Americans did not lose their job under Covid, and those that did got a $600 check every week for 26 weeks on top of unemployment.

    The real issues facing people are the same as they were pre-Covid: Skyrocketing housing costs with absolutely nothing affordable being built to alleviate the issue. Unaffordable healthcare. Unaffordable childcare. Most people have a job, and face those issues. Losing a $12/hr service job is a drop in the bucket, and focusing relief on the small minority still out of work is such a God damn waste that makes us look terrible.






  • KantNeverCould [any]toMain*Permanently Deleted*
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Republicans are stubborn, and there will be dry counties, but the cat is out of the bag when it comes to the drug war. Legal marijuana passed a ballot initiative in South Dakota last year with 54% of the vote!

    Note also that some red states still have restrictive alcohol laws

    A lot of blue/purple states do as well. Have you ever been to PA? Or Massachusetts, where you can't even have happy hours!


  • KantNeverCould [any]toMain*Permanently Deleted*
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Republicans are way behind – I don’t believe they’ve led any pro-pot movement anywhere in the country, and they picked noted drug warrior Jeff Sessions as AG a few years ago.

    Oklahoma has one of the biggest, laxest medical marijuana programs in the country. Their Republican AG actually overturned a bunch of proposed regulations for being too strict (things like banning everything but edibles from dispensaries or requiring a pharmacist be on site), and the state courts have shut down proposed restrictions. My guess is that this wil be a trend in other Red states in the next 10 years or so. It's going to be nanny state libs that make you have the Apple Store experience with product under lock and key and it's more expensive and shittier than what your dealer has. Red States will be more like how you expect - jars of weed that you pick out that are half the price.


  • KantNeverCould [any]toMain*Permanently Deleted*
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    To be fair, Illinois already had a pretty well developed medical cannabis market. And "liberal" Massachusetts took almost 3 years to open rec dispensaries after they legalized cannabis through a ballot initiative in 2016. Virginia currently has jack shit, and honestly, I would have guessed that VA would be the last state in the nation to legalize weed with all the super cops, super troops, and spooks that live there.




  • Start with Engels' 3 rules

    1. The law of the unity and conflict of opposites

    2. The law of the passage of quantitative changes into qualitative changes

    3. The law of the negation of the negation

    "Good" dialectical analysis is based on the conflict of opposites as opposed to using formal logical rules like the transitive property or the law of identity.


  • The fundamental thing about "dialectical" thinking that separates it from more "analytical" schools is the idea that objects and events don't have an "essence" or a "true nature" that can be abstracted away. Objects and events are always in a process of being what they are and becoming something new, and they only have meaning in terms of their relations with other real world objects, which are also always in a state of being and becoming.

    You can't practice it like a problem set of logical proofs because there is no right answer like a logic problem set. The problems you're analyzing don't have the same neat answers.

    "Dialectical" methods have been used pretty extensively in scientific discovery, though. Engels wrote a lot about this on the "Dialectics of Nature"