He wasn't ignoring her, you're too wrapped up in your own narrative. He was providing questions to ask to help lead his daughter to conclusion. She wasn't crying for six straight hours, she got frustrated because she's a child and wasn't given instant gratification.
Exact same energy as people who correct grammar in an argument, why bother trying to have a conversation when you're just gonna get all pissy because I used a specific word and refuse to address what I actually said.
You severely underestimate the mental capabilities of a nine year old. This kind of infantilization and coddling is way more damaging than anything the frontman of the long winters does to his child in this twitter thread
Maybe I might buy that if the food was an integral part of the greater lesson, but it's not, it's incidental to the situation. If she were trying to open up anything else in a can the lesson would be the same.
And don't even try the "but he said she couldn't eat until she opened the can" argument, he's obviously not going to let the child starve to the point of detriment, it's just a way to incentivise the learning experience.
I'm not sure if this is a conspiracy theory, but I think the GOP has been funneling money to hack country musicians to get them to make more music about how great small town life is to keep people from moving and weakening republican majorities in rural areas.
without access to pornography i wouldve never discovered the joy of prostate stimulation, so it must be a moral good