I'm not sure, but I'd say they vary an awful lot. Like a "small restaurant" with 25 employees in the middle of a big city with enough starting capital to buy ingredients in bulk and the best equipment would probably make this kind of margin, but ones with 5 employees and little or no capital might be more around that.

Despotism with Chinese characteristics

Replace semen with piss for an insightful read.

They can't, really. Most megacities have many urban cores, and often they formed from one city absorbing others, so they're basically many cities joined together. They often also don't function like other cities, or don't function at all - Dhaka, for instance, has terrible traffic.

people on one forum aren't all the same. for instance, you are a massive lib, but I am not. /lit/ is basically the only decent literature subreddit on the web, minus /pol/ nazis, because the ones on reddit are full of genre-fiction reading sanderson lovers

/lit/ can be alright. I'd say about a half the people on it are fascists, but there's a good few leftists too, plus everyone hates Ayn Rand.

Critique me, liberal.

Looked this up, turns out Call Me Kat is a reboot of the worst sitcom on British television, Miranda. how tf did they make it even worse? American shitness truly knows no bounds.

This is the only anime I've seen, and it's fascist af. The lore, specifically - some people are naturally stronger and better than others, and they create an empire, and then years later people lie that they committed genocide against the others, so they rise up and confine them to a small island off the coast of the large continent they once ruled. This is essentially the exact narrative of Japanese fascists, nearly word for word.

It's called a bis cuit (latin for "twice cooked") because it's twice cooked, idiot.

Extremely based and incredibly redpilled.

The UK has had a loneliness minister for years at this point.

utterly and completely based

souper weapon

**DAS COWPITAL ** You are a cow. Everyday, your milk is stolen violently by the capitalist farmer who owns you. You make the milk, but you eat the farmer's grass on the farmer's land and use the farmer's milking stales, so he is entitled to your product, and only has to give you enough food (wages) to survive. The same is broadly true of the farmhands who feed you, clean the stables and milk you. You can't go to the wild, because all of the land that grows your food was enclosed by capitalist farmers in the 16th century, doing something called primitive accumulation. So you have to grin and bear it. The farmer, though, has many cows like you, and eventually he'll make so much milk that he can fulfill his own milky needs, sell it to pay his farmhands, feed his cows and maintain his farm, but still have money left over. But he doesn't want his "work" to be in vain, so he'll live more lavishly and buy more cows. Eventually, he'll get so rich that him and his farmer friends will want someone else to do their work for them, so they'll set up a hedge fund with employees to invest their money for them. They're now alienated from the suffering their profit-seeking causes, and so are more able to dismiss it, and the hedge fund employees have strict orders to maximise profits. So milky profit margins have to keep going up. In addition to this, other groups of farmers have done the same, and all the farms in the world are now competing for profit, and consumers will buy the cheapest products, so the farms will lower their prices. Others will do the same, and no one will be able to raise them again because then they'd lose market share. So the rate of profits will tend to fall. You might say there'll be a tendency of the rate of profits to fall. So profit margins are falling and the hedge fund employees are supposed to grow them. So they'll look at the farms they run, and conclude the only ways to expand profit margins are to reduce costs and raise prices. Reducing costs means either lowering wages (of the farmhands or the feed they give you) or making things cheaper (eg. using cheaper feed, cheaper milking equipment). Of course, they could innovate and raise prices without causing suffering for the consumer, employee or cow, but this takes time and is expensive, so probably not an option most of the time. Eventually, the proledairyat will suffer so much from falling wages, poorer conditions and rising rents they will rise up and kill the farmers.

nah, most poachers are locals. selling to the west/china, maybe, but the poaching has stopped because the locals aren't allowed out.