Il faut se rendre sur chaque vote, et voter pour ou contre avec les flèches, je vais essayer de rendre ça plus clair.
Il faut se rendre sur chaque vote, et voter pour ou contre avec les flèches, je vais essayer de rendre ça plus clair.
Mon avis personnel, pour ceux que ça intéresse, est que ces deux instances sont remplies de ce qu'on qualifie ici de rouges-bruns, tankies, ou encore fascistes de gauche.
Ce sont avant tout des autoritaires qui aiment se dire de gauche, mais utilisent les mêmes outils, ont la même vision politique, la même organisation, et ont tendance politiquement et historiquement à s'allier aux fascistes "officiels" dès qu'un mouvement réellement de gauche révolutionnaire émerge.
Je trouvais tolérable de "ne rien faire" tant qu'ils restaient dans leurs coins, mais j'avais un peu oublié qu'un autoritaire reste un autoritaire et que la seule place qu'ils méritent est dans un puits, en n'oubliant pas de frapper les mains qui tentent de sortir avec un gros baton.
De mon point de vue c'est des gens un peu cons qui ont suivi le même pipeline de radicalisation qu'il y'avait y'a 10 ans sur 4chan, sauf qu'être un nazi est aujourd'hui mainstream.
Le pipeline d'edgy contrarien c'est donc l'inverse, celui des tankies qui viennent lécher les bottes d'un autoritaire et commettre des génocides, mais cette fois-ci, avec un drapeau rouge. Même attrait pour l'homme fort providentiel, l'élimination d'opposants à la définition aussi floue que variable, aux réponses simples à des problèmes complexes, et un goût prononcé pour les bottes en cuir.
Ils seraient nés 10 ans plus tôt, ils seraient MAGA tier à se branler sur du Camus (Renaud) tout en niant l'existence de la shoah à l'aide de blogs de schizophrènes marginaux.
On passerait à côté de participations de qualité comme dans ce thread.
I no longer feel sympathy towards the french
Kinda cringe than in all french history, that's what it took you.
Meh, I use tanky to differentiate between leftists and people that cosplay as leftist while excusing genocide and human rights violation whenever it's their flavor of autocrat doing it, not really as an anti-communist word since nobody uses it like that in the first place.
it sets a firm limit on how radical someone can be
No, it sets a limit on how much you accept your fellow comrades from being used as a stepping tool by an authoritarian regime/dictator to be able to call yourself "communist", while ending up in state capitalism anyway.
I may concede that from my years on hexbear, I associate most participants to this kind of communism flavor by default, which may not be your case, but this thread did not really start in good faith, so why would I.
wew lad, this must be shit tier bait
If you're talking about me, that's kind of a funny way to see it I guess, albeit pretty dumb and most likely lacking in political history for it to be your guess.
Thank you for your action.
I just came from a phone call with Macron, and thanks to you, he agreed to get out of Sahel, decolonize our DROM-COM, recognize palestinian genocide and form a french politburo to lead France towards communist revolution.
We couldn't have done without you
For someone now saying there isn’t an argument, you sure did use three consecutive angry adjectives in the same sentence to respond to their comment.
You’ve got quite the imbalance of nerve and self reflection, crying about people being aggressive and acting like unhinged assholes after how you just acted.
You should have realized that I adapt my tone to the one I respond to, by like, reading?
All you do is illustrate how profoundly meaningless your words are. You use the same invective to someone being reasonable as you do someone scolding you.
I don't think we have the same definition of reasonable, might have been lost in translation I guess.
The person who thinks non-whites are gangstalking them
The fuck you're talking about
the person who uses “tanky” as a slur against the only forum which strictly opposes all of the groups currently using tanks
>opens hexbear
>see a meme in the front page using the same rhetoric as Israel when it denies the palestinian genocide, to deny Uyghurs genocide by China
Kinda selective opposition I guess.
Look at the company you keep. Who else online is obsessed with genocide denial and defending authoritarian regimes? Not the left-wing ones.
Your backhanded way of avoiding an argument is to paint their comment in a certain light and ignore its content. I haven’t seen anyone say this obvious truth out loud yet so I will.
The point is that there is no argument in the first place, no one here intends to defederate from hexbear, and you and your mates coming here aggressively and acting like unhinged assholes unprompted in a meta-instance discussion does not help.
This post is just OP having his jimmies rumbled and asking if because of it if can cut one of the oldest instance from our fedlist.
Not only do I disagree with OP and therefore agree with with your mate, but I don't have any issue with drug use.
My issue is with the fact that ketamine fulled drivel is not the best way to communicate with people and be correctly understood, speaking from experience.
An actually apt analogy would be one of your theater club mate receiving a text advising to leave the theater club because it's full of dubious people, your mate saying "lol no", and you sending a 10 pages pamphlet to the friend sending the text accusing them to be a fascist, completely unprompted.
Fascism and anticommunism are twins, I recommend checking out the book I linked.
It's been a while that I've read it but iirc that's not what is described in the book due to the difference in intent.
Anticommunism is born from the ruling/fascist adjacent class to misled less politicized people by manufacturing false consciousness. While anticommunism materialistically helps capitalism and fascism, this is not the intent of the anticommunists, while it is the overt goal of the fascists.
A dumbass being anticommunist because of gaslighting is fundamentally different from someone being an actual fascist. The former will still be able to change his mind, the latter won't because it's usually coming from it's material interest.
Saying they are twins is not only a misleading, but it also hides the different mechanisms between anticommunism and fascism.
You're not leaving me, I'm leaving you!
L'argument généralement donné est qu'on ne dé-fédère pas de toutes les instances, mais de 2 dont le thème spécifique est lié à leur comportement.
Le second est qu'il faut traiter les intolérants/autoritaires de la même façon, qu'ils se disent de gauche ou pas, et que la question ne se poserait pas si on parlait d'instances néo-nazies, par exemple.