I think the thing they'd be more surprised of in this picture is the crop itself. A perfectly uniform monoculture that stretches for miles in every direction with massive heads of grain, free from any weeds but with no signs of any humans moving through the crop.
They didn't, but it's a bit of an optical illusion, because the reel doesn't extend quite to the end of the combine header. You can see the point of the header around the grain cart, there's no strip missing behind them, and it's being steered by GPS.
GPS drift does cause little single row strips sometimes and they do look awful, because they usually get left until the next growing season.
In a well balanced permaculture system they are great for exactly that reason, in a typical monoculture with mechanized harvesting they require a lot of tillage.
I was watching basketball last night and here's how Kamala is going after these voters, by telling them their friends and family can see if they voted on the public voting record.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3dW0UavZ48
I found more info here, sorry about the chud source https://archive.ph/pLGLi
"The more-than-$500,000 ad campaign appears to be targeted exclusively at various metropolitan areas, according to data obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The bulk of the ads are airing in the Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit, and Milwaukee markets."
Just saw an ad during the nationally televised Lakers-Suns game on ESPN with the exact same message.
"Your neighbors, family, co-workers can look up if you voted"
Paid for by future forward, which I looked up and it's funded by Bloomberg, and run by "Moneyball style" quants
538 had a 30% chance of Trump winning. Here's the last analysis prior to the election. Of my friends following politics at the time, I was the only one who thought Trump had a chance and was slightly worried explicitly because I was following 538.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/final-election-update-theres-a-wide-range-of-outcomes-and-most-of-them-come-up-clinton
Edit: I reread your comment and realized you meant specifically the scenario where Clinton won the popular vote but lost the electoral college, but Mr bronze's model gave that scenario a 10.5% chance if you look at the bottom of the final 2016 forecast, and it's also mentioned briefly in the analysis I posted above
Holy shit that graph is wild
I don't get why a 70/30 projection for Clinton should have humiliated him? He was more skeptical of Hillary than a lot of mainstream media. What should humiliate him are his dogshit analysis of political strategy and COVID stuff, not his projections
Had an experience yesterday that reminded me of this thread.
My mom was telling me my brother has been so sick because he can't eat anything but broth or oatmeal without getting crazy acid reflux. Upon suggesting that it's probably long COVID was obviously quickly shut down ("no it's not COVID, it's acid reflux"). Just looked up the literature and stomach/gut issues are like one of if not the most common long COVID symptom 
hey how do you join this, I tried last episode and I could only find the tankie.tube link which didn't have any chat/etc unless I'm missing something
Yeah there is levels to clean rooms, something like ISO 9 are basically just a well filtered work area whereas something like a semiconductor clean room is an absolute feat of engineering, and the complexity ramps up very quickly. Looking at the building construction and HVAC, this is either a very low level clean room or there was a small modular cleanroom elsewhere inside the manufacturing facility.
Nah, polls were overwhelmingly Biden for weeks at the election. Michigan wasn't really that close and even if he lost both he still wins the EC 280-268.
For context 
had 70/30 for Hillary and 90/10 for Biden.
Also worth noting that the "sixties scoop" of the residential school system just kind of morphed into the modern foster care system that still perpetuates the genocide of indigenous peoples in Canada:
“Public health credibility is really on the line here,” Mr Osterholm said.
Too late, the concept of public health is dead in the west.
Someone mentioned a father of three becoming a gambling addict. Of course I don't support that, and frankly I expect better of folks here than to jump into arguments like that. In that particular case I want the state to intervene for child endangerment leaning towards child abuse.
Just want to point out that you don't want the state to have power over you by banning your gambling treats, but you are fine with the state having the power to take away the children of gambling addicts.
Have a comrade who was recommended maid, their chronic illness is completely manageable, they just can't afford food and housing.
Feel like I keep getting bags that look ok but have a gross rotten layer in the middle of the onions.