He didn't even have the article linked so I didn't get to do a hate read.

  • uralsolo
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The least surprising move he could have made if you were closely tied into the skeptic/atheist movement in the 2000s/2010s. The Four Horsemen of Atheism unilaterally sucked, and the New Atheist movement overall was largely just a cover to launder Iraq-war-era Islamophobia and antisemitism as intellectualism rather than blind hate. Criticism of the Christian right was largely only tolerated at best or accepted through the lens of libertarian anti-government activism, rather than a genuine concern for the majority of the movement.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Dennett is mostly okay, I think. I'd primarily fault him for not attacking his peers more aggressively, though he certainly has attacked them with severity before (especially Harris)

        • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, Dennett and Paul Kurtz, both of whom I've met, are (or were, in the case of Kurtz) at the very least nice guys, and I found them to be generally among the less problematic New Atheist types, even if I find their strategy and thought process to be disagreeable as an accommodationist agnostic.